Affiliation:
1. Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery, Moscow
Abstract
Aim To determine the effect of minimally invasive interventions on the quality of life (QoL), pain syndrome, and cosmetic effect in patients with a pathology of chest aorta as compared with a group of traditional access.Material and methods From 2016 through 2020, 77 of 226 (34%) patients with an aneurysm in the proximal chest aorta and mini-sternotomy were prospectively selected starting from 2017. To evaluate differences between the effects of mini-sternotomy and the traditional access on QoL and pain syndrome a control group of patients with full sternotomy (n=77) was formed using pseudorandomization. Intergroup comparison of QoL, pain syndrome, and cosmetic parameters was performed at various time points.Results Mini-sternotomy provided a decrease in pain syndrome both during the early period (day 3), and during movements upon discharge. Also, mini-sternotomy decreased the duration of stay in the hospital compared to full sternotomy (8.1±2.1 vs. 8.9±2.5 days, respectively; р>0.0331). A more frequent use of analgesics by patients with full sternotomy was noted. Mini-sternotomy was associated with a faster recovery of most QoL parameters according to the SF-36 questionnaire at one year after surgery. The questionnaire included summarizing parameters of physical and mental health components (Physical Health Component, Physical Health (PH): 54.3±11.9 vs. 58.2±8.2, respectively; p=0.046; Mental Health Component, Mental Health (MH): 53.8±6.8 vs. 57.8±9.5, respectively; p=0.013). In addition, patients with minimal access showed higher values of the cosmetic effect by a 5-score scale (4.08±0.8 vs. 4.39±0.8, respectively; p=0.049) and a greater interest to having a minimal access surgery.Conclusion Mini-sternotomy beneficially influences the pain syndrome, cosmetic outcome, and QoL and provides a shorter duration of rehabilitation and a sooner return to work and everyday life compared to full sternotomy.
Publisher
APO Society of Specialists in Heart Failure
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Reference26 articles.
1. Rao PN, Kumar AS. Aortic valve replacement through right thoracotomy. Texas Heart Institute Journal. 1993;20(4):307–8. PMID: 8298332
2. Holmes SD, Fornaresio LM, Shuman DJ, Pritchard G, Ad N. HealthRelated Quality of Life after Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery. Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery. 2016;11(2):128–33. DOI: 10.1097/imi.0000000000000255
3. Walther T, Falk V, Metz S, Diegeler A, Battellini R, Autschbach R et al. Pain and quality of life after minimally invasive versus conventional cardiac surgery. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 1999;67(6):1643–7. DOI: 10.1016/S0003-4975(99)00284-2
4. Dogan S, Dzemali O, Wimmer-Greinecker G, Derra P, Doss M, Khan MF et al. Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a prospective randomized trial. The Journal of Heart Valve Disease. 2003;12(1):76–80. PMID: 12578340
5. Bonacchi M, Prifti E, Giunti G, Frati G, Sani G. Does ministernotomy improve postoperative outcome in aortic valve operation? A prospective randomized study. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2002;73(2):460–5. DOI: 10.1016/S0003-4975(01)03402-6