Intra-aortic balloon pump in patients with myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock of stages A and B-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Intra-aortic balloon pump in patients with myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock of stages A and B

Published:2022-07-31 Issue:7 Volume:62 Page:68-72
ISSN:2412-5660
Container-title:Kardiologiia
language:
Short-container-title:Kardiologiia

Author:

Vyshlov V. V.¹^ORCID,Panteleev O. O.¹^ORCID,Ryabov V. V.¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Research Institute of Cardiology, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Tomsk

Abstract

This article presents two clinical cases of patients with myocardial infarction and stage A (at risk) and B (beginning) cardiogenic shock who underwent intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP). In patients with a high risk of classic cardiogenic shock and/or the no-reflow phenomenon, stenting of the infarct-related coronary artery during this type of mechanical circulatory support was performed without complications. Theoretical and practical aspects of using IABP at different stages of cardiogenic shock are discussed.

Publisher

APO Society of Specialists in Heart Failure

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference13 articles.

1. Redfors B, Angerås O, Råmunddal T, Dworeck C, Haraldsson I, Ioanes D et al. 17-year trends in incidence and prognosis of cardiogenic shock in patients with acute myocardial infarction in western Sweden. International Journal of Cardiology. 2015;185:256–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.106

2. Wayangankar SA, Bangalore S, McCoy LA, Jneid H, Latif F, Karrowni W et al. Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Cardiogenic Shock in the Setting of Acute Myocardial Infarction. A report from the CathPCI Registry. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2016;9(4):341– 51. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.10.039

3. Baran DA, Grines CL, Bailey S, Burkhoff D, Hall SA, Henry TD et al. SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock: This document was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in April 2019. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2019;94(1):29–37. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28329

4. Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann F-J, Ferenc M, Olbrich H-G, Hausleiter J et al. Intraaortic Balloon Support for Myocardial Infarction with Cardiogenic Shock. New England Journal of Medicine. 2012;367(14):1287–96. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1208410

5. McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Böhm M et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. European Heart Journal. 2021;42(36):3599–726. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. SCAI Staging Application for Acute Myocardial Infarction-Related Cardiogenic Shock at a Single-Center Russian Registry;Journal of Clinical Medicine;2023-12-17

2. HEART RHYTHM AND CONDUCTIVITY DISTURBANCES IN MALES UNDER 50 YEARS OLD WITH CARDIOGENIC SHOCK DURING MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION;"Medical & pharmaceutical journal "Pulse";2023-03-30

3. Multiple drugs;Reactions Weekly;2023-01-21

4. THE CLINICAL COURSE FEATURES OF MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION, COMPLICATED CARDIOGENIC SHOCK, IN MALES UNDER 50 YEARS OLD;"Medical & pharmaceutical journal "Pulse";2023