Soil COS Exchange: A Comparison of Three European Ecosystems-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Soil COS Exchange: A Comparison of Three European Ecosystems

Published:2020-04 Issue:4 Volume:34 Page:
ISSN:0886-6236
Container-title:Global Biogeochemical Cycles
language:en
Short-container-title:Global Biogeochem. Cycles

Author:

Kitz Florian¹^ORCID,Spielmann Felix M.¹^ORCID,Hammerle Albin¹^ORCID,Kolle Olaf²^ORCID,Migliavacca Mirco²^ORCID,Moreno Gerardo³^ORCID,Ibrom Andreas⁴^ORCID,Krasnov Dmitrii⁵,Noe Steffen M.⁵^ORCID,Wohlfahrt Georg¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of EcologyUniversity of Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria

2. Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry Jena Germany

3. Forest Research Group, Universidad de Extremadura Plasencia Spain

4. Department of Environmental EngineeringTechnical University of Denmark Kongens Lyngby Denmark

5. Institute of Agricultural and Environmental SciencesEstonian University of Life Sciences Tartu Estonia

Funder

Austrian Science Fund

European Social Fund

Publisher

American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Subject

Atmospheric Science,General Environmental Science,Environmental Chemistry,Global and Planetary Change

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2019GB006202

Reference93 articles.

1. The effects of soil organic matter on soil water retention and plant water use in a meadow of the Sierra Nevada, CA

2. Photodegradation alleviates the lignin bottleneck for carbon turnover in terrestrial ecosystems

3. Constraining surface carbon fluxes using in situ measurements of carbonyl sulfide and carbon dioxide

4. A coupled model of the global cycles of carbonyl sulfide and CO 2 : A possible new window on the carbon cycle

5. Reappraisal of drying and wetting effects on C and N mineralization and fluxes in soils

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Carbonyl Sulfide (COS) in Terrestrial Ecosystem: What We Know and What We Do Not;Atmosphere;2024-06-28

2. Root and rhizosphere contribution to the net soil COS exchange;Plant and Soil;2023-12-23

3. Constraining the budget of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide using a 3-D chemical transport model;Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics;2023-09-08

4. On the variability of the leaf relative uptake rate of carbonyl sulfide compared to carbon dioxide: Insights from a paired field study with two soybean varieties;Agricultural and Forest Meteorology;2023-07

5. Carbon and Water Fluxes of the Boreal Evergreen Needleleaf Forest Biome Constrained by Assimilating Ecosystem Carbonyl Sulfide Flux Observations;Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences;2023-06-29