A Comprehensive Assessment of Anthropogenic and Natural Sources and Sinks of Australasia's Carbon Budget

Author:

Villalobos Yohanna1ORCID,Canadell Josep G.1ORCID,Keller Elizabeth D.2ORCID,Briggs Peter R.1ORCID,Bukosa Beata3ORCID,Giltrap Donna L.4ORCID,Harman Ian1ORCID,Hilton Timothy W.5ORCID,Kirschbaum Miko U. F.4ORCID,Lauerwald Ronny6ORCID,Liang Liyin L.4,Maavara Taylor7ORCID,Mikaloff‐Fletcher Sara E.3ORCID,Rayner Peter J.8ORCID,Resplandy Laure9ORCID,Rosentreter Judith1011ORCID,Metz Eva‐Marie12ORCID,Serrano Oscar1314ORCID,Smith Benjamin15ORCID

Affiliation:

1. CSIRO Environment Canberra ACT Australia

2. GNS Science Lower Hutt New Zealand and Victoria University of Wellington Wellington New Zealand

3. NIWA National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Wellington New Zealand

4. Manaaki Whenua—Landcare Research Palmerston North New Zealand

5. GNS Science Lower Hutt New Zealand

6. Université Paris‐Saclay INRAe AgroParisTech UMR EcoSys Palaiseau France

7. School of Geography University of Leeds West Yorkshire UK

8. School of Geography, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences University of Melbourne Melbourne VIC Australia

9. Department of Geosciences High Meadows Environmental Institute Princeton University Princeton NJ USA

10. Faculty of Science and Engineering Southern Cross University Lismore NSW Australia

11. Yale Institute for Biospheric Studies Yale University New Haven CT USA

12. Institute of Environmental Physics Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany

13. Centre d'Estudis Avançats de Blanes Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas Blanes Spain

14. School of Science and Centre for Marine Ecosystems Research Edith Cowan University Joondalup WA Australia

15. Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment Western Sydney University Richmond NSW Australia

Abstract

AbstractRegional carbon budget assessments attribute and track changes in carbon sources and sinks and support the development and monitoring the efficacy of climate policies. We present a comprehensive assessment of the natural and anthropogenic carbon (C‐CO2) fluxes for Australasia as a whole, as well as for Australia and New Zealand individually, for the period from 2010 to 2019, using two approaches: bottom‐up methods that integrate flux estimates from land‐surface models, data‐driven models, and inventory estimates; and top‐down atmospheric inversions based on satellite and in situ measurements. Our bottom‐up decadal assessment suggests that Australasia's net carbon balance was close to carbon neutral (−0.4 ± 77.0 TgC yr−1). However, substantial uncertainties remain in this estimate, primarily driven by the large spread between our regional terrestrial biosphere simulations and predictions from global ecosystem models. Within Australasia, Australia was a net source of 38.2 ± 75.8 TgC yr−1, and New Zealand was a net CO2 sink of −38.6 ± 13.4 TgC yr−1. The top‐down approach using atmospheric CO2 inversions indicates that fluxes derived from the latest satellite retrievals are consistent within the range of uncertainties with Australia's bottom‐up budget. For New Zealand, the best agreement was found with a national scale flux inversion estimate based on in situ measurements, which provide better constrained of fluxes than satellite flux inversions. This study marks an important step toward a more comprehensive understanding of the net CO2 balance in both countries, facilitating the improvement of carbon accounting approaches and strategies to reduce emissions.

Publisher

American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Subject

Atmospheric Science,General Environmental Science,Environmental Chemistry,Global and Planetary Change

Reference122 articles.

1. The dominant role of semi-arid ecosystems in the trend and variability of the land CO 2 sink

2. Andrew R. M. &Peters G. P.(2021).The global carbon project's fossil CO2emissions dataset (2021v34)[Dataset].Zenodo.https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.5569235

3. Australian National Inventory Report. (2019).The Australian Government submission to the United Nations framework convention on climate change Australian National Greenhouse accounts(Vol.1). Retrieved fromhttps://www.dcceew.gov.au/climate-change/publications/national-greenhouse-accounts-2019/national-inventory-report-2019

4. Baisden W. T. Beets P. Carran R. A. Clark H. Ford‐Robertson J. B. Francis G. S. et al. (2001).An assessment of the significance to New Zealand of article 3.4 activities under the Kyoto protocol: A report.

5. Bridge to the future: Important lessons from 20 years of ecosystem observations made by the OzFlux network

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3