Martian Ozone Observed by TGO/NOMAD‐UVIS Solar Occultation: An Inter‐Comparison of Three Retrieval Methods

Author:

Piccialli A.1ORCID,Vandaele A. C.1ORCID,Willame Y.1,Määttänen A.2ORCID,Trompet L.1ORCID,Erwin J. T.1,Daerden F.1ORCID,Neary L.1ORCID,Aoki S.13ORCID,Viscardy S.1ORCID,Thomas I. R.1ORCID,Depiesse C.1ORCID,Ristic B.1ORCID,Mason J. P.3,Patel M. R.34ORCID,Wolff M. J.5ORCID,Khayat A. S. J.6ORCID,Bellucci G.7,Lopez‐Moreno J.‐J.8

Affiliation:

1. Planetary Aeronomy Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy Brussels Belgium

2. LATMOS/IPSL Sorbonne Université UVSQ CNRS Paris France

3. Graduate School of Frontier Sciences The University of Tokyo Kashiwa Japan

4. School of Physical Sciences The Open University Milton Keynes UK

5. Space Science and Technology Department Science and Technology Facilities Council Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Oxfordshire UK

6. Planetary Systems Laboratory Solar System Exploration Division NASA Goddard Space Flight Center MD Greenbelt USA

7. Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali IAPS‐INAF Rome Italy

8. Instituto de Astrofisica de Andalucia IAA‐CSIC Granada Spain

Abstract

AbstractThe NOMAD‐UVIS instrument on board the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter has been investigating the Martian atmosphere with the occultation technique since April 2018. Here, we analyze almost two Mars Years of ozone vertical distributions acquired at the day‐night terminator. The ozone retrievals proved more difficult than expected due to spurious detections of ozone caused by instrumental effects, high dust content, and very low values of ozone. This led us to compare the results from three different retrieval approaches: (a) an onion peeling method, (b) a full occultation Optimal Estimation Method, and (c) a direct onion peeling method. The three methods produce consistently similar results, especially where ozone densities are higher. The main challenge was to find reliable criteria to exclude spurious detections of O3, and we finally adopted two criteria for filtering: (a) a detection limit, and (b) the Δχ2 criterion. Both criteria exclude spurious O3 values especially near the perihelion (180° < Ls < 340°), where up to 98% of ozone detections are filtered out, in agreement with general circulation models, that expect very low values of ozone in this season. Our agrees well with published analysis of the NOMAD‐UVIS data set, as we confirm the main features observed previously, that is, the high‐altitude ozone peak around 40 km at high latitudes. The filtering approaches are in good agreement with those implemented for the SPICAM/MEx observations and underline the need to evaluate carefully the quality of ozone retrievals in occultations.

Funder

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

United Kingdom Space Agency

Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades

European Regional Development Fund

Publisher

American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,Environmental Science (miscellaneous)

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3