Multicriterion decision analysis approach to assess the utility of watershed modeling for management decisions-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Multicriterion decision analysis approach to assess the utility of watershed modeling for management decisions

Published:2006-09 Issue:9 Volume:42 Page:
ISSN:0043-1397
Container-title:Water Resources Research
language:en
Short-container-title:Water Resour. Res.

Author:

Elshorbagy Amin¹

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Advanced Numerical Simulation, Department of Civil and Geological Engineering; University of Saskatchewan; Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada

Publisher

American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Subject

Water Science and Technology

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1029/2005WR004264/fullpdf

Reference41 articles.

1. Water Sci. Appl. Ser.;Bastidas,2003

2. Boese , K. 2003 The design and installation of a field instrumentation program for the evaluation of soil-atmosphere water fluxes in a vegetated cover over saline/sodic shale overburden Univ. of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Sask., Canada

3. Interactive multiobjective analysis embedding the decision maker's implicit preference function;Bogardi;Water Resour. Bull.,1992

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Integrated watershed modeling using interval valued fuzzy computations to enhance watershed restoration and protection at field-scale;Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment;2022-01-18

2. Dealing with Water Conflicts: A Comprehensive Review of MCDM Approaches to Manage Freshwater Ecosystem Services;Land;2021-04-30

3. Negotiating land for flood risk management : upstream-downstream in the light of economic game theory;Journal of Flood Risk Management;2017-09-12

4. Simulating Reservoir System Operation Under Given Scenarios to Determine Operating Policy with the ‘Good’ Resilience;NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security;2017

5. ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications;European Journal of Operational Research;2016-04