Improved Estimates of Sub‐Regional Groundwater Storage Anomaly Using Coordinated Forward Modeling

Author:

Ma Yalin12ORCID,Pan Yun12ORCID,Zhang Chong12ORCID,Yeh Pat J.‐F.3ORCID,Xu Li4ORCID,Huang Zhiyong567ORCID,Gong Huili12

Affiliation:

1. Beijing Laboratory of Water Resources Security Capital Normal University Beijing China

2. College of Resource Environment and Tourism Capital Normal University Beijing China

3. Discipline of Civil Engineering Monash University (Malaysia Campus) Subang Jaya Malaysia

4. Global Institute for Water Security University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon SK Canada

5. School of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering Changsha University of Science & Technology Changsha China

6. Key Laboratory of Water‐Sediment Sciences and Water Disaster Prevention of Hunan Province Changsha China

7. Key Laboratory of Dongting Lake Aquatic Eco‐Environmental Control and Restoration of Hunan Province Changsha China

Abstract

AbstractGroundwater storage anomaly (GWSA) can be estimated either at the large scale from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) or at the local scale based on in situ observed groundwater level (GWL) and aquifer storage parameters. Yet, the accuracy of GRACE‐based estimate is affected by leakage errors, while that of local GWL‐based estimate requires the reliable specific yield (Sy) data that are usually not available. Here, we developed a novel approach, the coordinated forward modeling (CoFM), based on the iterative forward modeling to improve GWSA estimation at the sub‐regional scale smaller than the typical GRACE footprint. It is achieved by solving Sy through iterative comparisons between GRACE‐based and observation‐based GWSA at 0.5° grid scale, and then re‐calculating GWSA using the updated Sy and observed GWL. The utility of CoFM is explored by using the hypothetical experiments and a real case study in the Piedmont Plain (PP, ∼54,000 km2) and East‐central Plain (ECP, ∼86,000 km2) of North China Plain. Results show that CoFM can detect GWSA at 0.5° grid scale in the hypothetical experiments given the large spatial variability of GWL. While in the real case study, the CoFM distinguishes between the divergent unconfined GWSA trends (2005–2016) in PP (−41.80 ± 0.55 mm/yr) and ECP (−7.57 ± 0.60 mm/yr) caused by the differences in hydrogeological conditions and groundwater use. The improvement made by CoFM can be attributed to the use of the distributed GWL information to constrain GRACE leakage errors. This study highlights a practical important solution for improving sub‐regional GWSA estimation through the joint use of large‐scale GRACE data and local‐scale well observations.

Publisher

American Geophysical Union (AGU)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3