The Lack of a QBO‐MJO Connection in Climate Models With a Nudged Stratosphere

Author:

Martin Zane K.1,Simpson Isla R.2ORCID,Lin Pu3ORCID,Orbe Clara4ORCID,Tang Qi5ORCID,Caron Julie M.2ORCID,Chen Chih‐Chieh2ORCID,Kim Hyemi67,Leung L. Ruby8ORCID,Richter Jadwiga H.2ORCID,Xie Shaocheng5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Atmospheric Science Colorado State University Fort Collins CO USA

2. Climate and Global Dynamics Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder CO USA

3. Program in Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Princeton University Princeton NJ USA

4. NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies New York NY USA

5. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore CA USA

6. Department of Science Education Ewha Womans University Seoul Republic of Korea

7. School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences Stony Brook NY USA

8. Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland WA USA

Abstract

AbstractThe observed stratospheric quasi‐biennial oscillation (QBO) and the tropospheric Madden‐Julian oscillation (MJO) are strongly connected in boreal winter, with stronger MJO activity when lower‐stratospheric winds are easterly. However, the current generation of climate models with internally generated representations of the QBO and MJO do not simulate the observed QBO‐MJO connection, for reasons that remain unclear. This study builds on prior work exploring the QBO‐MJO link in climate models whose stratospheric winds are relaxed toward reanalysis, reducing stratospheric biases in the model and imposing a realistic QBO. A series of ensemble experiments are performed using four state‐of‐the‐art climate models capable of representing the MJO over the period 1980–2015, each with similar nudging in the stratosphere. In these four models, nudging leads to a good representation of QBO wind and temperature signals, however no model simulates the observed QBO‐MJO relationship. Biases in MJO vertical structure and cloud‐radiative feedbacks are investigated, but no conclusive model bias or mechanism is identified that explains the lack of a QBO‐MJO connection.

Funder

National Science Foundation

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

National Center for Atmospheric Research

Biological and Environmental Research

U.S. Department of Energy

Office of Science

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

Laboratory Directed Research and Development

Goddard Institute for Space Studies

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Goddard Space Flight Center

Publisher

American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Subject

Space and Planetary Science,Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Atmospheric Science,Geophysics

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3