Affiliation:
1. Center for Colorado River Studies Department of Watershed Sciences Quinney College of Natural Resources Utah State University Logan UT USA
2. Now at National Park Service Water Resource Division Fort Collins CO USA
Abstract
AbstractSediment budgets are widely used to measure reach‐scale sediment accumulation and evacuation. Such measurements, however, cannot determine when the disturbance is major and the measured sediment mass imbalance is reflective of a river adjusting to a new equilibrium state, as opposed to situations when the disturbance is minor, and the mass imbalance is reflective of a river adjusting within its existing behavioral regime. Sediment sorting among channels and floodplains can have a large effect on how a river responds to a disturbance. Fine sediment may accumulate in the floodplains while coarser sediment erodes from the channel bed. We demonstrate that if a sediment budget does not account for the different behavior and destination of grain sizes, the budget cannot reveal important channel adjustments. In this study, we evaluated how a sand bed river responded to increases in sediment supply by partitioning a sediment budget among silt/clay and five sand fractions. On average, 12 metric tons/meter (downstream)/year of sand was evacuated from the system, but sorting caused channel margins to behave differently from vegetated islands, revealing how a river can slightly narrow while in deficit. Floodplain shaving and bed coarsening evacuated sediment while channel geometry barely changed, consistent with a river adjusting to a minor disturbance within its behavioral regime. This study is an important reminder that sediment mass imbalance does not always lead to channel change. Mechanisms such as floodplain shaving and bed textural change help rivers absorb minor disturbances and resist channel change.
Publisher
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献