New Views of Lunar Seismicity Brought by Analysis of Newly Discovered Moonquakes in Apollo Short‐Period Seismic Data

Author:

Onodera Keisuke12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Earthquake Research Institute The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan

2. Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris CNRS Université Paris Cité Paris France

Abstract

AbstractIn the 1970s, two types of seismometers were installed on the nearside of the Moon. One type is called the Long‐Period (LP) seismometer, which is sensitive below 1.5 Hz. The other is called the Short‐Period (SP) seismometer, whose sensitivity is high around 2–10 Hz. So far, more than 13,000 seismic events have been identified through analyzing the LP data, which allowed us to investigate lunar seismicity and its internal structure. On the other hand, most of the SP data have remained unanalyzed because they include numerous artifacts. This fact leads to the hypotheses that (a) we have missed lots of high‐frequency seismic events and (b) lunar seismicity could be underestimated. To verify these ideas, I conducted an analysis of the SP data. In the analysis, I denoised the original SP data and performed the event detections by comparing the spectral features between the cataloged high‐frequency events (such as shallow moonquakes) and the continuous SP data. Eventually, I discovered 22,000 new seismic events, including thermal moonquakes, impact‐induced events, and shallow moonquakes. Among these, I focused on analyzing shallow moonquakes—tectonic‐related quakes. Consequently, it turned out that there were 2.6 times more tectonic events than considered before. Furthermore, additional detections of shallow moonquakes enabled me to see the regionality in seismicity. Comparing three landing sites (Apollo 14, 15, and 16), I found that the Apollo 15 site was more seismically active than others. These findings can change the conventional views of lunar seismicity.

Funder

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

Publisher

American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Reference98 articles.

1. A look towards the future in the handling of space science mission geometry

2. Maximum likelihood estimate of b in the formula log10 N=a‐bM and its confidence limits;Aki K.;Bulletin of Earthquake Research,1965

3. Scaling law of seismic spectrum

4. Origin of coda waves: Source, attenuation, and scattering effects

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3