Quantitative Evaluation of the Competing Effects of Wastewater Disposal and Hydraulic Fracturing on Causing Induced Earthquakes: A Case Study of an M3.1 Earthquake Sequence in Western Canada

Abstract

AbstractPrevious studies mainly attribute injection‐induced earthquakes (IIE) to hydraulic fracturing (HF) operations in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin (WCSB), whereas the role of wastewater disposal (WD) has been largely overlooked. One particular reason is that HF operations usually exhibit a clearer spatiotemporal relationship to IIE than WD. However, ignoring the effects from WD when investigating the seismogenisis of IIE in the WCSB may not be appropriate, especially when both types of injection activities are present in the vicinity of the epicentral area. Here, we conduct a case study on an M3.1 earthquake sequence located in the WCSB that can be spatiotemporally correlated with both active HF and WD operations. We first build an enhanced catalog consisting of 256 events to delineate the relationship between the occurrence of IIE and injection history. We then investigate the source parameters of the mainshock in detail. Finally, we build a numerical model to calculate the Coulomb stress change caused by each type of injections on the two nodal planes of the derived focal mechanism. The result suggests that the M3.1 event probably occurred on a near‐horizontal nodal plane. In addition, the pore pressure diffusion from WD and the poroelastic stress transfer from HF could work collaboratively to cause an IIE. Therefore, stress perturbation caused by long‐term WD should also be considered in the seismogenic process of an IIE, especially when both active HF and WD are in the immediate vicinity of the IIE.