Eleven‐Year Survey of the Magmatic‐Hydrothermal Fluids From Peteroa Volcano: Identifying Precursory Signals of the 2018–2019 Eruption

Author:

Agusto Mariano12ORCID,Lamberti María Clara12ORCID,Tassi Franco34,Carbajal Fabricio5,Llano Joaquín12,Nogués Victoria2,Núñez Nicolás6,Sánchez Hernán6,Rizzo Andrea7,García Sebastián5ORCID,Yiries Jazmín12,Vélez María Laura1,Massenzio Antonella12,Velasquez Gabriela8,Bucarey Claudia8,Gómez Martín6,Euillades Pablo9,Ramos Víctor12

Affiliation:

1. Departamento de Ciencias Geológicas Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales Universidad de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina

2. Instituto de Estudios Andinos “Don Pablo Groeber” (IDEAN) CONICET—Universidad de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina

3. Università degli Studi di Firenze Firenze Italia

4. CNR‐IGG Institute of Geosciences and Earth Resources Florence Italy

5. SEGEMAR Observatorio Argentino de Vigilancia Volcánica (OAVV) Buenos Aires Argentina

6. Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica (CNEA) ICES Buenos Aires Argentina

7. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences University of Milano‐Bicocca Milan Italy

8. SERNAGEOMIN Observatorio Volcánico de los Andes del Sur (OVDAS) Temuco Chile

9. Facultad de Ingeniería Instituto CEDIAC Universidad Nacional de Cuyo Mendoza Argentina

Abstract

AbstractOver the past decade, we have conducted geochemical and isotopic monitoring of the fumarolic gases of the Peteroa volcano (Argentina‐Chile). Using the resulting data set, we constructed a conceptual model that describes the evolution of the magmatic‐hydrothermal system and identifies precursory geochemical signals of the last eruption. Our data set includes new chemical and isotopic analyses of fumarolic gas samples collected from 2016 to 2021, as well as previously published data from the 2010–2015 period. After an eruptive period in 2010–2011, the activity was characterized by low degassing rates and seismic activity. However, an increase in seismic activity and fumarolic gas emissions was observed from 2016 to 2018–2019 eruptive episode, leading to a major phreato‐magmatic eruption. Fumarole gases show different compositions during quiescent versus unrest/eruptive degassing related to the interaction of deep (magmatic) and shallow (hydrothermal) fluid contributions. During quiescent periods, fumaroles exhibited low SO2/H2S, HF/CO2, and HCl/CO2 ratios (<0.1), revealing a dominant hydrothermal contribution. In contrast, during pre‐and syn‐eruptive periods, fumaroles showed ratios up to 100 times higher indicative of an enhanced magmatic input. When compared to the evolution of the seismic activity, the increment of magmatic‐related strong acidic gases suggests repeated inputs of hot magmatic fluids, which are only partially dissolved into the hydrothermal system feeding the fumaroles. Interestingly, the 3He/4He and δ13C‐CO2 values remained relatively constant during the magmatic and hydrothermal degassing in 2016–2021, suggesting that the deep magmatic gas source did not significantly change throughout variations in Peteroa's activity.

Funder

Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica

Secretaría de Ciencia y Técnica, Universidad de Buenos Aires

Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación

Publisher

American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Subject

Geochemistry and Petrology,Geophysics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3