Affiliation:
1. United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment and Health (UNU‐INWEH) Hamilton ON Canada
2. Bren School of Environmental Science and Management University of California, Santa Barbara Santa Barbara CA USA
3. Department of Mechanical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburg PA USA
Abstract
AbstractBased on a multi‐attribute assessment of the environmental impacts and challenges associated with global Bitcoin (BTC) mining activities around the globe, we call for urgent action by the scientific, policy, and advocacy communities. The worldwide BTC mining network consumed 173.42 TWh of electricity during the 2020–2021 period, bigger than the electricity consumption of most nations. The mining process emitted over 85.89 Mt of CO2eq in the same timeframe, equivalent to the emission caused by burning 84 billion pounds of coal or running 190 natural gas‐fired power plants. The environmental footprint of BTC mining is not limited to greenhouse gas emissions. In 2020–2021, the global water footprint of BTC mining was about 1.65 km3, more than the domestic water use of 300 million people in rural Sub‐Saharan Africa. The land footprint of the global BTC mining network during this period was more than 1,870 square kilometers, 1.4 times the area of Los Angeles. These striking numbers highlight the heavy reliance of the BTC network on fossil fuels and natural resource‐intensive energy sources, resulting in major but unmonitored and unregulated environmental footprints. To mitigate the environmental costs of BTC mining, immediate policy interventions, technological advancements, and scientific research are crucial. Proposed measures include enhanced transparency, economic and regulatory tools, developing energy‐efficient alternative coins, and the adoption of greener blockchain validation protocols.
Publisher
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
Subject
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),General Environmental Science
Reference22 articles.
1. BBC NEWS. (2023).US leads Bitcoin mining as China ban takes effect”. [Online]. Retrieved fromhttps://www.bbc.com/news/technology-58896545
2. Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance. (2023).Cambridge bitcoin electricity consumption index[Dataset].CBECI. Retrieved fromwww.cbeci.org
3. CoinMarketCap. (2023).Cryptocurrency prices charts and market capitalizations. Retrieved fromcoinmarketcap.com
4. Digiconomist. (2021).Bitcoin energy consumption index. Retrieved fromhttp://digiconomist.net/bitcoin-energy-consumption
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献