A Robust Quantitative Method to Distinguish Runoff‐Generated Debris Flows From Floods

Author:

Cavagnaro David B.12ORCID,McCoy Scott W.1ORCID,Kean Jason W.3ORCID,Thomas Matthew A.3ORCID,Lindsay Donald N.4,McArdell Brian W.5,Hirschberg Jacob6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Geological Sciences and Engineering University of Nevada Reno NV USA

2. Now at: California Geological Survey Sacramento CA USA

3. U.S. Geological Survey, Geologic Hazards Science Center Golden CO USA

4. California Geological Survey Redding CA USA

5. Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL) Birmensdorf Switzerland

6. Department of Earth Sciences Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zürich Switzerland

Abstract

AbstractDebris flows and floods generated by rainfall runoff occur in rocky mountainous landscapes and burned steeplands. Flow type is commonly identified post‐event through interpretation of depositional structures, but these may be poorly preserved or misinterpreted. Prior research indicates that discharge magnitude is commonly amplified in debris flows relative to floods due to volumetric bulking and increased frictional resistance. Here, we use this flow amplification to develop a metric (Q*) to separate debris flows from floods based on the ratio of observed peak discharge to the theoretical maximum water discharge from rainfall runoff. We compile 642 observations of floods and debris flows and demonstrate that Q* distinguishes flow type to ∼92% accuracy. Q* allows for accurate identification of debris flows through simple channel cross‐section surveys rather than through qualitative interpretation of deposits, and therefore should increase the performance of models and engineered structures that require accurate flow‐type observations.

Publisher

American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Reference73 articles.

1. Multi‐Model Comparison of Computed Debris Flow Runout for the 9 January 2018 Montecito, California Post‐Wildfire Event

2. Consideration of the Validity of Debris-flow Bulking Factors

3. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). (2014).Highway design manual Chapter 810‐ Hydrology: Electronic document. Retrieved fromhttp://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/oppd/hdm/hdmtoc.htm#hdm

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3