Determining the Orientation of a Magnetic Reconnection X Line and Implications for a 2D Coordinate System

Author:

Denton Richard E.1ORCID,Liu Yi‐Hsin1ORCID,Agudelo Rueda Jefferson A.1,Genestreti Kevin J.2ORCID,Hasegawa Hiroshi3,Hosner Martin45ORCID,Torbert Roy B.6,Burch James L.7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Physics and Astronomy Dartmouth College Hanover NH USA

2. Space Science and Engineering Division Southwest Research Institute Durham NH USA

3. Institute of Space and Astronautical Science JAXA Sagamihara Japan

4. Space Research Institute Austrian Academy of Sciences Graz Austria

5. Institute of Physics University of Graz Graz Austria

6. Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space University of New Hampshire Durham NH USA

7. Space Science and Engineering Division Southwest Research Institute San Antonio TX USA

Abstract

AbstractAn LMN coordinate system for magnetic reconnection events is sometimes determined by defining N as the direction of the gradient across the current sheet and L as the direction of maximum variance of the magnetic field. The third direction, M, is often assumed to be the direction of zero gradient, and thus the orientation of the X line. But when there is a guide field, the X line direction may have a significant component in the L direction defined in this way. For a 2D description, a coordinate system describing such an event would preferably be defined using a different coordinate direction M′ oriented along the X line. Here we use a 3D particle‐in‐cell simulation to show that the X line is oriented approximately along the direction bisecting the asymptotic magnetic field directions on the two sides of the current sheet. We describe two possible ways to determine the orientation of the X line from spacecraft data, one using the minimum gradient direction from Minimum Directional Derivative analysis at distances of the order of the current sheet thickness from the X line, and another using the bisection direction based on the asymptotic magnetic fields outside the current sheet. We discuss conditions for validity of these estimates, and we illustrate these conditions using several Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) events. We also show that intersection of a flux rope due to secondary reconnection with the primary X line can destroy invariance along the X line and negate the validity of a two‐dimensional description.

Funder

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

National Science Foundation

Publisher

American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Subject

Space and Planetary Science,Geophysics

Reference35 articles.

1. Argall M. R. Fischer D. Le Contel O. Mirioni L. Torbert R. B. Dors I. et al. (2018).The fluxgate‐searchcoil merged (FSM) magnetic field data product for MMS. ArXiv. Retrieved fromhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1809.07388

2. Advances in petascale kinetic plasma simulation with VPIC and Roadrunner

3. Magnetospheric Multiscale Overview and Science Objectives

4. Electron-scale measurements of magnetic reconnection in space

5. Electron diffusion region during magnetopause reconnection with an intermediate guide field: Magnetospheric multiscale observations

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3