Evaluating Auroral Forecasts Against Satellite Observations Under Different Levels of Geomagnetic Activity

Author:

Mooney M. K.123ORCID,Forsyth C.2ORCID,Marsh M. S.3ORCID,Bradley L.4,Finnigan T.4,Forde F.4,Garrigan F.4,Mancini‐Tuffier C.4,Mancini‐Tuffier T.4,Roberts E.4,Vessoni P.4,Powell J.4,Clark S.4,Lao C. J.2ORCID,Smith A.25ORCID,Jackson D. R.3ORCID,Bingham S.3,Sharpe M.3ORCID,Hughes T.3ORCID,Chisham G.6ORCID,Milan S.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Leicester Leicester UK

2. Mullard Space Science Laboratory University College London Dorking UK

3. Met Office Exeter UK

4. St Richard Reynolds Catholic College London UK

5. Department of Mathematics, Physics and Electrical Engineering Northumbria University Newcastle Upon Tyne UK

6. British Antarctic Survey Cambridge UK

Abstract

AbstractThe aurora and associated high energy particles and currents pose a space weather hazard to communication networks and ground‐based infrastructure. Forecasting the location of the auroral oval forms an integral component of daily space weather operations. We evaluate a version of the OVATION‐Prime 2013 auroral forecast model that was implemented for operational use at the UK Met Office Space Weather Operations Cent. Building on our earlier studies, we evaluate the ability of the OVATION‐Prime 2013 model to predict the location of the auroral oval in all latitude and local time sectors under different levels of geomagnetic activity, defined by Kp. We compare the model predictions against auroral boundaries determined from IMAGE FUV data. Our analysis shows that the model performs well at predicting the equatorward extent of the auroral oval, particularly as the equatorward auroral boundary expands to lower latitudes for increasing Kp levels. The model performance is reduced in the high latitude region near the poleward auroral boundary, particularly in the nightside sectors where the model does not accurately capture the expansion and contraction of the polar cap as the open flux content of the magnetosphere changes. For increasing levels of geomagnetic activity (Kp ≥ 3), the performance of the model decreases, with the poleward edge of the auroral oval typically observed at lower latitudes than forecast. As such, the forecast poleward edge of the auroral oval is less reliable during more active and hazardous intervals.

Funder

Natural Environment Research Council

Science and Technology Facilities Council

Publisher

American Geophysical Union (AGU)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3