Improvement Analysis of a Height‐Deviation Compensation‐Based Linear Interpolation Method for Multi‐Station Regional Troposphere

Author:

Wang Pengxu1,Liu Hui1ORCID,Wen Jingren1,Zhou Bin1,Qian Chuang2,Zhang Yi3

Affiliation:

1. GNSS Research Center of Wuhan University, and Luojia Laboratory Wuhan China

2. Intelligent Transportation Systems Research Center Wuhan University of Technology Wuhan China

3. Guangzhou Laneposition Technology Co., Ltd. Guangzhou China

Abstract

AbstractIn network real‐time kinematic positioning of multi‐reference station, the spatial and temporal distribution of tropospheric delay is affected by both horizontal and elevation. The traditional modeling strategy of regional troposphere takes more consideration of the horizontal factor, and the incomplete consideration of the elevation factor will lead to the problem of reduced modeling accuracy, especially in the face of the scene with large regional height deviation. Based on the traditional linear interpolation method (LIM), a simple and effective height‐deviation compensation‐based linear interpolation method (HCLIM) for regional tropospheric is proposed. The modeling accuracy of troposphere and the positioning accuracy of user RTK in large height deviation region are significantly improved. The method was verified based on six experimental subnets with large height deviations from a provincial continuously operating GNSS reference stations network in central China. The results showed that: For GPS satellite modeling, compared with the traditional LIM method, the average modeling accuracy improvement rate of HCLIM method is (84.5%, 75.5%, 59.3%, 26.7%) in the elevation angle range of (10–30°/30–40°/40–50°/50–90°). For BDS satellite, the average modeling accuracy improvement rate of HCLIM method in the above four elevation angles is (83.3%, 70%, 50%, 23.5%). For the positioning performance of user RTK, The horizontal positioning accuracy and RTK fixing rate were similar under the two methods, while HCLIM method showed only slight improvement. However, in the U direction, LIM method showed obvious systematic bias, while HCLIM method showed consistent positioning accuracy, which was improved to 82.8% compared with LIM method.

Publisher

American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,Environmental Science (miscellaneous)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3