Evolution of the Convective Boundary Layer in a WRF Simulation Nested Down to 100 m Resolution During a Cloud‐Free Case of LAFE, 2017 and Comparison to Observations

Author:

Bauer Hans‐Stefan1ORCID,Späth Florian1ORCID,Lange Diego1ORCID,Thundathil Rohith1,Ingwersen Joachim2,Behrendt Andreas1ORCID,Wulfmeyer Volker1

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Physics and Meteorology University of Hohenheim Stuttgart Germany

2. Institute of Soil Sciences—Department of Biogeophysics University of Hohenheim Stuttgart Germany

Abstract

AbstractThe Weather Research and Forecasting model was applied in a nested configuration from the convection‐permitting resolution of 2.5 km, via an intermediate resolution of 500 m down to the 100 m turbulence‐permitting scale to investigate the spatial and temporal evolution of the convective boundary layer and their interaction with the underlying land surface. This included detailed comparisons with observations collected during the Land‐Atmosphere Feedback Experiment, performed at the Central Facility in Oklahoma. The simulation was driven by the operational analysis of the European Center for Medium‐range Weather Forecasting for a cloud‐free case on 23 August 2017 for which the measurement operation was extended into the following night to include the evening decay of the daytime convective boundary layer. The mesoscale 2.5 km resolution was capable to represent the correct boundary layer height and its temporal evolution. Details of the morning and evening transitions between the nighttime and daytime boundary layer as well as its internal structure were only simulated by the 100 m turbulence‐permitting simulation. Although systematic differences between the simulation and lidar observations were found, the model captured the temporal and spatial structure and the statistics of turbulence rather well. Comparison with data from Eddy‐Covariance stations showed that the model was able to reproduce the evolution of many near‐surface meteorological fields. Systematically higher surface temperatures and related differences in the surface fluxes suggest weaknesses in the representation of land surface processes although the simulation was initialized with accurate and high‐resolution initial fields.

Publisher

American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Subject

Space and Planetary Science,Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Atmospheric Science,Geophysics

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3