Affiliation:
1. Deutsches Zentrum für Luft‐ und Raumfahrt e.V. (DLR), Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre Wessling Germany
2. Center for Learning the Earth with Artificial Intelligence and Physics (LEAP), Columbia University New York NY USA
3. Max Planck Institute for Meteorology Hamburg Germany
4. University of Bremen, Institute of Environmental Physics (IUP) Bremen Germany
Abstract
AbstractMachine learning (ML)‐based parameterizations have been developed for Earth System Models (ESMs) with the goal to better represent subgrid‐scale processes or to accelerate computations. ML‐based parameterizations within hybrid ESMs have successfully learned subgrid‐scale processes from short high‐resolution simulations. However, most studies used a particular ML method to parameterize the subgrid tendencies or fluxes originating from the compound effect of various small‐scale processes (e.g., radiation, convection, gravity waves) in mostly idealized settings or from superparameterizations. Here, we use a filtering technique to explicitly separate convection from these processes in simulations with the Icosahedral Non‐hydrostatic modeling framework (ICON) in a realistic setting and benchmark various ML algorithms against each other offline. We discover that an unablated U‐Net, while showing the best offline performance, learns reverse causal relations between convective precipitation and subgrid fluxes. While we were able to connect the learned relations of the U‐Net to physical processes this was not possible for the non‐deep learning‐based Gradient Boosted Trees. The ML algorithms are then coupled online to the host ICON model. Our best online performing model, an ablated U‐Net excluding precipitating tracer species, indicates higher agreement for simulated precipitation extremes and mean with the high‐resolution simulation compared to the traditional scheme. However, a smoothing bias is introduced both in water vapor path and mean precipitation. Online, the ablated U‐Net significantly improves stability compared to the non‐ablated U‐Net and runs stable for the full simulation period of 180 days. Our results hint to the potential to significantly reduce systematic errors with hybrid ESMs.
Funder
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Publisher
American Geophysical Union (AGU)