Müzikal Minimalizm: Bir Yanıltıcı Ad Mı?

Author:

TORUN Orhan1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DEVLET KONSERVATUVARI

Abstract

Whether the term ‘minimal’ is appropriate for the music to which it refers to has been a subject of debate among scholars and composers. Many alternative terms were suggested as substitutions or complements. Consequently, the extent to which minimalist music is minimal has been discussed. Most of the previous studies on the distinctive qualities of minimal music and whether the term is misleading provided either a discussion of the alternative terminology or a comparison of minimal art and music; on the other hand, this essay aims to investigate the ways in which minimal music is ‘minimal’ with a broader view from the perspectives of different disciplines, which is necessary. First, previous studies on understanding why such music and art are considered ‘minimal’ are reviewed and compared. To establish a broader perspective for accuracy, the focus is not limited to the period between the 1960s and 1980s, when minimalist music appeared, developed, and flourished. Sociocultural dynamics surrounding this art and music are also considered since they reflect in the surface qualities of the works; hence a two-way relationship. However, the related sociocultural aspects are only briefly mentioned since they are not in the main scope of this study. Second, the first known publication in which the term is used in a distinctive musical context is presented and discussed in addition to the other starting points suggested by scholars; moreover, the spectrum is broadened with the first publication in which the term was used in the arts due to the reason that there is a direct relationship between the two. Third, a comparison and discussion of minimal art and minimal music is provided regarding the main question of whether minimal music is a misnomer by choosing two representative works from each discipline. Fourth, alternative terminology is discussed in an attempt to provide an answer to the fundamental question, the objective of the paper. At the end of the historical, theoretical and aesthetic enquiry, it is proposed that the term ‘minimal’ is not completely inaccurate to denote this music; however, regarding minimalist music as the ‘emancipation of repetition’ provides more insight into evaluating its importance in Western art music.

Publisher

İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Türk Musikisi Devlet Konservatuarı

Reference31 articles.

1. Andre, C. (1969). Lever [Sculpture]. L’art moderne. Retrieved May 5, 2023, from https://art.moderne.utl13.fr/2014/03/cours-du-10-mars-2014/2/

2. Bernard, J. W. (1993). The Minimalist Aesthetic in the Plastic Arts and Music. Perspectives of New Music, 31(1), 86–132. https://doi.org/10.2307/833043

3. Bernard, J. W. (2003). Minimalism, Postminimalism, and the Resurgence of Tonality in Recent American Music. American Music, 21(1), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250558

4. Cage, J. (2011). John Cage Seçme Yazılar (S. Fırıncıoğlu, Ed.). Pan Yayıncılık.

5. Cage, J. (2011). Satie’nin Savunması. In S. Fırıncıoğlu (Ed.), John Cage Seçme Yazılar (pp. 85–92). Pan Yayıncılık.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3