Effect of valsartan and captopril in rabbit carotid injury. Possible involvement of bradykinin in the antiproliferative action of the renin-angiotensin blockade

Abstract

The effects of the specific angiotensin II (Ang II) AT1receptor blocker valsartan on events related to restenosis were investigated in rabbits after common carotid balloon injury. Six animals were given valsartan from two days prior to injury until 14 days post-injury. Three control groups (n=6 in each group) were either sham-operated, untreated or treated with the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, captopril. Both ACE inhibition and AT1-receptor blockade had marked effects on plasma levels of endothelin ET1, thromboxane TXB2 and 6-keto-PGF1-alpha. The most dramatic effects on ET1 levels were seen in rabbits treated with valsartan, where levels were reduced to values close to those for sham-operated animals (96.85 vs. 86.45 pg/ml). Captopril treatment led to a statistically significant (p<0.01) reduction in ET1 levels compared with untreated animals, but the reduction was only about half that seen with AT1receptor blockade. TXB2 levels doubled (202.58 vs. 413.28 pg/ml) upon arterial injury in control animals but rose by only 20—35% in rabbits treated with captopril (246.45 pg/ml) or valsartan (268.13). In untreated animals, 6-keto-PGF1-alpha levels decreased slightly after injury, but for both the captopril and valsartan groups, there were significant increases in levels of this prostaglandin derivative, effects attributed to the action of bradykinins. Levels were highest in the captopril-treated animals. Valsartan and captopril treatment led to a significant reduction in neointimal thickness and the extent of lumen stenosis compared with untreated animals. Both treatments were effective in reducing neointimal area and significantly (p<0.05) reduced cell proliferation. The differences between treatments can be attributed to the different actions of the agents, as valsartan leaves the AT2-receptor unblocked, while captopril, through inhibition of Ang II synthesis, prevents stimulation of both receptors. A combination of both treatments may be a possible way forward in the clinical prevention of restenosis.