Abstract
The world observed a well-developed Russian strategy and military model have had destabilizing consequences and wide-ranging implications for international security, in particular for Europe, and global stability since the Ukraine crisis. Needless to say, most European countries and notably NATO conclude that Russian policy, military strategy, and military practice in the Ukraine crisis challenge the European security and carry significant implications for NATO, therefore the Ukraine crisis force the EU and NATO to concentrate on measures against Russian strategy.[1]
In reality, Russia has already given the signals of its intentions via the Military Doctrine 2010 and Defense Strategy 2013 that list destabilization of the near abroad, in other words buffer zone, and NATO or the EU expansion, including deployment of military forces, as most relevant military threats. Both documents highlight that “Russia faced the very real threat of being side-lined in international affairs.” [2] Furthermore MacKinnon suggests that in line with its new regime change strategy, the United States forced the former Soviet Union’s member states to establish their political institutions, provided funds for the opposition, and supported revolutions in Georgia, Ukraine, and Kyrgyzstan. Thus, the revolutions added to the Kremlin’s perception that “Washington’s chief objective might have been to change the regime in Russia as well.”[3] Likewise, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said “NATO’s expansion by pulling more Russia’s neighboring countries into the alliance is unacceptable”.[4] Therefore it could be concluded from Russian point of view that everything should be done to prevent NATO and the EU expansion which can be characterized as the greatest threat to Russian security, and that’s why Russia must restore its status as a great power inside its own sphere of influence.
It is the aim of this analytic paper to search why the EU and NATO have failed to manage the crisis emanating from Russian aggression and expansion in Ukraine, and to address the current strategic environment as well. I shall try to analyze the drivers and the reasons of NATO and the EU’s poor reaction against Russia, and finally I will emphasize why and how the roles of NATO and the European Security Strategy should be reconsidered in the light of energy security policy of the EU, and why NATO and the EU needs to improve their responsiveness rather than readiness.
Publisher
Beyond the Horizon International Strategic Studies Group
Reference23 articles.
1. Kazantsev, Policy Networks in European–Russian Gas Relations: Function and Dysfunction from a Perspective of EU Energy Security, Communist and Post-Communist Studies 45, pp.305–313, 2012.
2. Tsygankov, US–Russia Relations in the Post-Western World, pp.35, 2012.
3. Baran, Z., EU Energy Security: Time to End Russian Leverage. The Washington Quarterly 30 (4), 131–144, 2007.
4. BND Analysis, On Russian’s Hybrid Warfare, Military Policy/Armed Forces, pp.1, 2014.
5. Pavel, Leading in the Concert of Great Powers: Lessons from Russia’s G8 Chairmanship, 2009. In The Multilateral Dimension in Russian Foreign Policy, edited by E.W.Rowe and S. Torjesen, 58–68. London: Routledge.