Comparative Study on the Topspin and Retopspin Execution
Biomechanics in Female Cadets
-
Published:2023-09-01
Issue:Vol.14, no.3
Volume:
Page:589
-
ISSN:2734-8458
-
Container-title:Balneo and PRM Research Journal
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:
Author:
Mocanu Mircea1, Mocanu George2, Savu Catalin1, Onu Ana3, Balint Nela-Tatiana4, Musat Carmina Liana5
Affiliation:
1. Department of Sport Games and Physical Education, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galați, 800008 Galați, România 2. Department of Individual Sports and Kinetotherapy, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galați, 800008 Galați, România 3. Faculty of Medical Bioengineering, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa” Iaşi, 700454 Iaşi, Romania 4. Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy, “Vasile Alecsandri” University of Bacau,600115 Bacau, Romania 5. Department of Morphological and Functional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, "Dunărea de Jos" University, 800008 Galati, Romania
Abstract
Background: Many high-performance table tennis specialists and athletes may wonder if there are differences between the two most used technical-tactical elements in attack and which are these, given that their name and the biomechanical execution are characterized by approximately similar landmarks. Knowing the differences between the two technical elements, we will be able to understand and streamline the execution biomechanics. The biomechanical analysis of a large number of athletes on the three stages of execution and speed developed at the time of using topspin or retopspin (counter loop). Methods: The research engaged several 10 Romanian sportswomen involved in high-performance table tennis, with ages between 13-15 years old. Goal: Identify the distinctive biomechanical features between the two elements and the speed needed for execution optimization. Results: For data collection, analysis, and interpretation, we used Excel, IBM SPSS Statistics 23, analysis software Dartfish 360s, and for the technical-tactical expression level ‘’Topspin with crosswise retopspin, forehand, and backhand’’, “Butterfly” and “Multiball training”. Conclusions (4): The preparation of the forehand topspin hit requires an angle of 146.36 degrees(0) and 0.36 seconds(s) for the entire execution, while the forehand retopspin is 134.20 and 0.31 s, backhand topspin hit requires an angle of 920 and 0.32 s, while the retopspin 86,720 and 0.26 s for the entire execution.
Publisher
Romanian Association of Balneology
Reference26 articles.
1. 1. https://www.ittf.com/2019/04/28/greatest-time-ma-long-wins-third-straight-world-championshipseight-day-epic-ends-budapest/Accesed 5/3/2019 2. 2. Mishra, R., & Singh, D.J. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF BALL VELOCITY WHILE PLAYING WITH DIFFERENT RACKET COVERINGS IN TABLE TENNIS. International Journal of Behavioral Social and Movement Sciences. 2023, 12(01), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.55968/ijobsms.v12i01.460 3. 3. Wu, Y., Lan, J., Shu, X., Ji, C., Zhao, K., Wang, J., & Zhang, H. iTTVis: Interactive visualization of table tennis data. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics. 2017, 24(1), 709-718. 4. 4. Jing-Wei Liu, Ming-Hua Hsu, Chun-Liang Lai et al. Using Video Analysis and Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Explore Association Rules and Influence Scenarios in Elite Table Tennis Matches, 27 June 2023, PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square, 2023, https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs3078938/v1 5. 5. Soyler, M., & Cingoz, Y. E. Balance control, agility, eye-hand coordination for the sportive performance of amateur tennis players: A pilot study. Journal of ROL Sport Sciences. 2023, 4(2), 729– 745. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8017639
|
|