Comparative Study on the Topspin and Retopspin Execution Biomechanics in Female Cadets

Author:

Mocanu Mircea1,Mocanu George2,Savu Catalin1,Onu Ana3,Balint Nela-Tatiana4,Musat Carmina Liana5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Sport Games and Physical Education, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galați, 800008 Galați, România

2. Department of Individual Sports and Kinetotherapy, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galați, 800008 Galați, România

3. Faculty of Medical Bioengineering, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T. Popa” Iaşi, 700454 Iaşi, Romania

4. Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy, “Vasile Alecsandri” University of Bacau,600115 Bacau, Romania

5. Department of Morphological and Functional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, "Dunărea de Jos" University, 800008 Galati, Romania

Abstract

Background: Many high-performance table tennis specialists and athletes may wonder if there are differences between the two most used technical-tactical elements in attack and which are these, given that their name and the biomechanical execution are characterized by approximately similar landmarks. Knowing the differences between the two technical elements, we will be able to understand and streamline the execution biomechanics. The biomechanical analysis of a large number of athletes on the three stages of execution and speed developed at the time of using topspin or retopspin (counter loop). Methods: The research engaged several 10 Romanian sportswomen involved in high-performance table tennis, with ages between 13-15 years old. Goal: Identify the distinctive biomechanical features between the two elements and the speed needed for execution optimization. Results: For data collection, analysis, and interpretation, we used Excel, IBM SPSS Statistics 23, analysis software Dartfish 360s, and for the technical-tactical expression level ‘’Topspin with crosswise retopspin, forehand, and backhand’’, “Butterfly” and “Multiball training”. Conclusions (4): The preparation of the forehand topspin hit requires an angle of 146.36 degrees(0) and 0.36 seconds(s) for the entire execution, while the forehand retopspin is 134.20 and 0.31 s, backhand topspin hit requires an angle of 920 and 0.32 s, while the retopspin 86,720 and 0.26 s for the entire execution.

Publisher

Romanian Association of Balneology

Subject

General Medicine

Reference26 articles.

1. 1. https://www.ittf.com/2019/04/28/greatest-time-ma-long-wins-third-straight-world-championshipseight-day-epic-ends-budapest/Accesed 5/3/2019

2. 2. Mishra, R., & Singh, D.J. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF BALL VELOCITY WHILE PLAYING WITH DIFFERENT RACKET COVERINGS IN TABLE TENNIS. International Journal of Behavioral Social and Movement Sciences. 2023, 12(01), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.55968/ijobsms.v12i01.460

3. 3. Wu, Y., Lan, J., Shu, X., Ji, C., Zhao, K., Wang, J., & Zhang, H. iTTVis: Interactive visualization of table tennis data. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics. 2017, 24(1), 709-718.

4. 4. Jing-Wei Liu, Ming-Hua Hsu, Chun-Liang Lai et al. Using Video Analysis and Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Explore Association Rules and Influence Scenarios in Elite Table Tennis Matches, 27 June 2023, PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square, 2023, https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs3078938/v1

5. 5. Soyler, M., & Cingoz, Y. E. Balance control, agility, eye-hand coordination for the sportive performance of amateur tennis players: A pilot study. Journal of ROL Sport Sciences. 2023, 4(2), 729– 745. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8017639

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3