Engaging Communities in Emergency Risk and Crisis Communication: Mixed-Method Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis

Author:

Novak Julie1ORCID,Day Ashleigh1ORCID,Sopory Pradeep1,Wilkins Lee1,Padgett Donyale1,Eckert Stine1,Noyes Jane2,Allen Tomas3,Alexander Nyka3,Vanderford Marsha3,Gamhewage Gaya3

Affiliation:

1. Wayne State University

2. Bangor University

3. World Health Organization

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) commissioned systematic reviews to assist with the development of new emergency risk communication guidelines that will impact responses and distribution of resources at all levels. This mixed-method evidence synthesis, guided by Cochrane principles and methods, examined the extant research in countries throughout the world, published from 2003 to 2016, related to the best practices to engage communities in preparing for and responding to emergency events with public health implications. Although few studies directly examined which strategies or tactics effectively engage public participation, many studies reinforced the importance of community participation. The findings support the perspective that emergency events are communicatively understood by all publics and that they benefit from emergency risk communication before, during, and after such events, especially when grounded in local contexts. Although the importance of local context limits the generalizability of risk communication, it is important to continue studying strategies and tactics to cultivate participation among all stakeholders.

Funder

World Health Organization

Publisher

Nicholson School of Communication, UCF

Reference50 articles.

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). CERC manual. Retrieved from https://emergency.cdc.gov/cerc/manual/index.asp Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018). CERC manual. Retrieved from https://emergency.cdc.gov/cerc/manual/index.asp

2. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. (2013). CASP qualitative checklist. Retrieved from http://www.casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists

3. Davids, E. L., & Roman, N. V. (2014). A systematic review of the relationship between parenting styles and children’s physical activity. African Journal for Physical, Health Education, Recreation, and Dance, 20, 228–246. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC162511

4. Effective Practice and Organisation of Care. (2015). Suggested risk of bias criteria for EPOC reviews. Retrieved from http://epoc.cochrane.org/epoc -specific-resources-review-authors

5. Higgins, J. P. T., & Green, S. (Eds.). (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Version 5.1.0, updated March 2011). Retrieved from http://www.handbook.cochrane.org

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3