Affiliation:
1. University of Amsterdam
2. Technische Universitaet Dresden
Abstract
In this theoretical paper, we delineate two fundamental paradigms in how scholars conceptualize the nature of machines in human-machine communication (HMC). In addition to the well-known Media Equation paradigm, we distinguish the Media Evocation paradigm. The Media Equation paradigm entails that people respond to machines as if they are humans, whereas the Media Evocation paradigm conceptualizes machines as objects that can evoke reflections about ontological categories. For each paradigm, we present the main propositions, research methodologies, and current challenges. We conclude with theoretical implications on how to integrate the two paradigms, and with a call for mixedmethod research that includes innovative data analyses and that takes ontological classifications into account when explaining social responses to machines.
Publisher
Nicholson School of Communication, UCF
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Communication,Health (social science)
Reference33 articles.
1. Araujo, T. (2018). Living up to the chatbot hype: The influence of anthropomorphic design cues and communicative agency framing on conversational agent and company perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2 Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Prentice-Hall. Braun-Thürmann, H. (2002). Künstliche Interaktion. Wie Technik zur Teilnehmerin sozialer Wirklichkeit wird. [Artificial interaction. How technology becomes a participant in social reality.]
2. Westdeutscher Verlag. Carey, J. W. (1989). Communication as culture: Essays on media and society. Routledge.
3. Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
4. Edwards, A. (2018). Animals, humans, and machines: Interactive implications of ontological classification. In A. L. Guzman (Ed.), Human-machine communication: Rethinking communication, technology, and ourselves (pp. 29–49). Peter Lang. https://doi. org/10.3726/b14414
5. Edwards, A., & Edwards, C. (2022). Does the correspondence bias apply to social robots?: Dispositional and situational attributions of human versus robot behavior. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.788242
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献