Ethical Conduct with Invertebrate Animals: Routes for Inclusive, Humanitarian, and Sustainable Education

Author:

Luciane Fischer Marta1ORCID,Zacarkin Santos Juliana1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. 1School of Life Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Parana, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil .

Abstract

Perceptions of nature depend on experiences relating to biodiversity, thus this study investigated the representation of invertebrates in different sections of Brazilian society by means of a questionnaire available from March to December 2015 as a resource in terms of the conservation of nature and human health in order to design an ethical values guide for this relationship. This study tested the hypotheses that there are differences in the conception and representation: a) associated with gender, educational level, use of animals in vocational training, tutoring, and housing area; b) according to the role assigned to invertebrates as a resource, including in conservation and health; and c) that the different representations result in different value assignments used to intermediate decisions on how, when, and why to use invertebrates. Thus, through quantitative and cross-sectional research, our objective was to identify the popular representation of invertebrates. The analysis of the results of an online questionnaire with 281 respondents showed definitions and concepts that were predominantly similar to the tested variables, which suggests that the present study provides evidence for the understanding of the ecological importance of the invertebrates, the belief in their sentience, and disagreement with the substitutive use of vertebrates in experimentation. However, the naturalistic and ecological positions regarding nature prevailed, indicating the persistence of utilitarian values. The results cast interpretive clues that the only by cooperation between education and environmental bioethics will possible the confluence of values and interests of animals and human in favor of a critical, ethical, and sustainable society.

Publisher

Enviro Research Publishers

Subject

General Medicine

Reference92 articles.

1. Morris D. The Animal Contract: Sharing London: The Planet.Virgin Books, 1990.

2. Baeder F.M, Padovani M.C.R, Moreno, D.C.A, Delfino, C.S. Percepção histórica da Bioética na pesquisa com animais: possibilidades. Bioethikos. 2012; 6:313-320.

3. Oliveira L.N, Rodrigues G.S, Gualdi C.B, Feijó A.G.S. A Lei Arouca e o uso de animais em ensino e pesquisa na visão de um grupo de docentes. Bioetikos. 2013; 7:139-149.

4. Fischer M.L, Oliveira GM. Ética no uso de animais: A experiência do comitê de ética no uso de animais da Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná. Est Biol. 2012; 34:83.

5. CrossRef

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3