Abstract
This article analyzes the status quo and cooperation mechanism between ASEAN and China, mainly, the non-traditional security issues in the South China Sea space (SCS). The non-traditional security threats confronting the SCS are complex, diverse and enormous. Amongst those are transnational maritime crimes, marine disaster threat, marine ecological environmental threat, and resource scarcity. Recent trends have demonstrated that the established regimes between ASEAN and China, for non-traditional security cooperation in the SCS, are fragmented mainly due to the absence of integrated and long-term mechanisms. Three reasons hinder the acceleration of the cooperation process: interference from outside powers, insufficient mutual political trust between China and ASEAN members, claimants and divergence of interests in advancing the Code of Conduct (COC) in the SCS. This article aims to analyze the problems and the causes existing between China and ASEAN in dealing with non-traditional security cooperation. It also examines the effectiveness of the rules-based cooperation mechanisms and offers a few recommendations. It is argued that ASEAN and China should take advantage of the low sensitivity of non-traditional security issues and high-quality development of the One Belt and One Road Initiative, to construct an integrated framework based on rules jointly and order for multilateral non-traditional security cooperation in the SCS. Three possible and workable measures are recommended to facilitate non-traditional security cooperation between ASEAN and China in the SCS. Both sides, primarily ASEAN member claimants, pursue an excellent willingness to cooperate and could promote functional cooperation, promote successful maritime cooperation modes as long-term cooperation mechanisms in the SCS, focus on strengthening the capacity-building of marine governance, and comprehensively establish a multilateral cooperation mechanism in marine environmental protection and fishery resources management.
Publisher
Bussecon International Academy
Reference29 articles.
1. Aziz, S. N. A., & Basir, S. M. (2022). South China Sea: ASEAN Mechanism on Maritime Disputes and the Rise of Indo Pacific Region. The Journal of Territorial and Maritime Studies, 9(2), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.2307/JTMS.9.2.65 /©2022
2. Caballero-Anthony, M. (2016). An Introduction to Non-Traditional Security Studies: A Transnational Approach. London: Sage Publications.
3. Castro, R. C. D. (2020). The Limits of Intergovernmentalism: The Philippines’ Changing Strategy in the South China Sea Dispute and Its Impact on the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 39(3), 335-358. https://doi.org/10.1177/1868103420935562
4. China Power Team. (2020). How much Trade Transits the South China Sea? https://chinapower. csis.org/much-trade-transits-south-china-sea/ [Accessed January 15, 2022].
5. Cuong, N. X., & Huy, D. V. (2021). ASEAN’s Role in Promoting Non-Traditional Security Cooperation in the South China Sea: A Perspective from the Issues of Fisheries Security. The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 33(2), 313-335. https://doi.org/10.22883/kjda.2021.33.2.007
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献