Quality Measurement in Cancer Care: A Review and Endorsement of High-Impact Measures and Concepts-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Quality Measurement in Cancer Care: A Review and Endorsement of High-Impact Measures and Concepts

Published:2020-03 Issue:3 Volume:18 Page:250-259
ISSN:1540-1405
Container-title:Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

D’Amico Thomas A.¹,Bandini Lindsey A.M.²,Balch Alan³,Benson Al B.⁴,Edge Stephen B.⁵,Fitzgerald C. Lyn²,Green Robert J.⁶,Koh Wui-Jin²,Kolodziej Michael⁷,Kumar Shaji⁸,Meropol Neal J.⁶,Mohler James L.⁵,Pfister David⁹,Walters Ronald S.¹⁰,Carlson Robert W.²

Affiliation:

1. aDuke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina;

2. bNational Comprehensive Cancer Network, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania;

3. cThe National Patient Advocate Foundation, Washington, DC;

4. dRobert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois;

5. eRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York;

6. fFlatiron Health, New York, New York;

7. gADVI, Washington, DC;

8. hMayo Clinic Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota;

9. iMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and

10. jThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Abstract

Although oncology care has evolved, outcome assessment remains a key challenge. Outcome measurement requires identification and adoption of a succinct list of metrics indicative of high-quality cancer care for use within and across healthcare systems. NCCN established an advisory committee, the NCCN Quality and Outcomes Committee, consisting of provider experts from NCCN Member Institutions and other stakeholders, including payers and patient advocacy, community oncology, and health information technology representatives, to review the existing quality landscape and identify contemporary, relevant cancer quality and outcomes measures by reevaluating validated measures for endorsement and proposing new measure concepts to fill crucial gaps. This manuscript reports on 22 measures and concepts; 15 that align with existing measures and 7 that are new.

Publisher

Harborside Press, LLC

Subject

Oncology

Cited by 22 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Quality of care assessment for non-small cell lung cancer patients: transforming routine care data into a continuous improvement system;Clinical and Translational Oncology;2024-08-16

2. Capturing catchment area data comprehensively: The North Carolina Cancer Health Assets and Needs Assessment (CHANA) approach;Preventive Oncology & Epidemiology;2024-06-06

3. Improving quality of care by standardising patient data collection in electronic medical records in an oncology department in Spain;BMJ Open Quality;2024-06

4. Guideline-concordant breast cancer care by patient race and ethnicity accounting for individual-, facility- and area-level characteristics: a SEER-Medicare study;Cancer Causes & Control;2024-03-28

5. Quality indicators for evaluating cancer care in low-income and middle-income country settings: a multinational modified Delphi study;The Lancet Oncology;2024-02