Barriers and Facilitators Impacting Lung Cancer Screening Uptake Among Black Veterans: A Qualitative Study

Author:

Navuluri Neelima123,Lanford Tiera4,Shapiro Abigail4,Krishnan Govind1,Johnson Angela B.5,Riley Isaretta L.12,Zullig Leah L.46,Cox Christopher E.1,Shofer Scott12

Affiliation:

1. Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC

2. Department of Medicine, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC

3. Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC

4. Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veteran Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC

5. Institute for Medical Research, Durham, NC

6. Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC

Abstract

Background: Racial disparities in lung cancer screening (LCS) are well established. Black Veterans are among those at the highest risk for developing lung cancer but are less likely to complete LCS. We sought to identify barriers and facilitators to LCS uptake among Black Veterans. Patients and Methods: A qualitative study using semistructured interviews was conducted with 32 Black Veterans to assess for barriers, facilitators, and contextual factors for LCS and strategies to improve screening. Veterans were purposively sampled by age, sex, and LCS participation status (ie, patients who received a low-dose CT [LDCT], patients who contacted the screening program but did not receive an LDCT, and patients who did not connect with the screening program nor receive an LDCT). Interview guides were developed using the Theoretical Domains Framework and Health Belief Model. Data were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis. Results: Barriers of LCS uptake among Black Veterans include self-reported low LCS knowledge and poor memory, attention, and decision processes associated with the centralized LCS process. Facilitators of LCS uptake among Black Veterans include social/professional role; identity and social influences; perceived susceptibility, threat, and consequences due to smoking status and military or occupational exposures; emotion, behavioral regulation, and intentions; and high trust in providers. Environmental context and resources (eg, transportation) and race and racism serve as contextual factors that did not emerge as having a major impact on LCS uptake. Strategies to improve LCS uptake included increased social messaging surrounding LCS, various forms of information dissemination, LCS reminders, balanced and repeated shared decision-making discussions, and streamlined referrals. Conclusions: We identified addressable barriers and facilitators for LCS uptake among Black Veterans that can help focus efforts to improve disparities in screening. Future studies should explore provider perspectives and test interventions to improve equity in LCS.

Publisher

Harborside Press, LLC

Reference35 articles.

1. Disparities in lung cancer screening: a review;Haddad DN,2020

2. Cancer statistics, 2019;Siegel RL,2019

3. Cancer statistics for African Americans, 2016: progress and opportunities in reducing racial disparities;DeSantis CE,2016

4. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening;Aberle DR,2011

5. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with volume CT screening in a randomized trial;de Koning HJ,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3