Towards the Politicization of Artificial Intelligence in the EU? External Influences and Internal Dynamics

Author:

Poseliuzhna IlonaORCID

Abstract

This paper explores the politicization of Artificial Intelligence (AI) within the EU, examining the interplay between internal dynamics and external influences, particularly from the United States and China. The study aims to identify early signs of politicization in the EU’s AI debate and compare the EU’s AI policy model with those of the US and China. The hypothesis posits that EU public debate on AI is politicized, shaped by both internal factors and responses to external AI policy models. The research uses comparative policy analysis and content analysis. Findings indicate a growing salience of AI in public discourse, evidenced by increased media attention and engagement from a wide range of actors. However, significant polarization on AI issues within the EU is not yet evident. The study also highlights the EU’s strategic response to external AI models, emphasizing a balance between innovation, digital sovereignty, and the protection of democratic values and fundamental rights.

Publisher

Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan

Reference54 articles.

1. Algorithm Watch (2023), EU legislators must close dangerous loophole in AI Act, Statement, 7.09.2023, https://algorithmwatch.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/20230728_AI-Act_Article-6-NGO-statement-draft_-AlgorithmWatch.pdf.

2. Allison G., Schmidt E. (2020), Is China Beating the US to AI Supremacy?, Harvard Kennedy School Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, https://www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/2020-08/AISupremacy.pdf.

3. Bertuzzi L. (2022), The US unofficial position on upcoming EU Artificial Intelligence rules, Euractiv, 24.10.2022, https://www.euractiv.com/section/digital/news/the-us-unofficial-position-on-upcoming-eu-artificial-intelligence-rules/.

4. Blumenthal R. (2023), Blumenthal & Hawley announce bipartisan framework on artificial intelligence legislation, Richard Blumenthal’s website, 8.09.2023, https://www.blumenthal.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/blumenthal-and-hawley-announce-bipartisan-framework-on-artificial-intelligence-legislation.

5. Bradford A. (2023), Digital empires: The global battle to regulate technology, New York.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3