Abstract
Lunar craters are the only and most significant surface features of a planetary body in Outer Space that are visible to the naked eye. While we can only look at the surface of other planets and their moons through probes, robots and telescopes, the moon requires no instruments or technological tools to be seen. Despite this significant difference – that the Moon’s surface features are visible to any human on a clear night, the history and current process of naming Lunar craters does not recognize that dif- ference. Rather, Lunar craters are subject to the same type of seemingly scientific naming process as that ascribed to the remaining 40 planetary bodies in our Solar System that currently have a naming protocol for surface features. In this paper, I argue that both this lack of distinction and the resistance (under the umbrella of both historical precedent and scientific selenographic naming conventions) to name changes of prominent Lunar craters has resulted in a unique form of post-terrestrial epistemic violence – a violence evident in global social pedagogies of outer space that remain silent on this most important issue of who has the right to name the heavens.
Publisher
Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan
Reference16 articles.
1. Andersson L.A., Whitaker E.A., NASA catalogue of lunar nomenclature (No. NAS 1.61:1097), 1982.
2. Batson R.M., Russell J.F., Gazetteer of planetary nomenclature 1994 (No. 2129), US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey, 1995.
3. Fairclough N., Language and power, London 1989.
4. Gaither T., Hayward R., Planetary Nomenclature: An Overview and Update for 2017, „AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts” 2017, 49.
5. Hargitai H.I., Page D., Canón-Tapia E., Rodrigue C.M., Classification and characterization of planetary landforms, [in:] Encyclopedia of planetary landforms, New York 2015,