From King Hyegong to Suh Dongjin: the evolution of LGBT and homosexual rights in the Korean community, according to historiographical texts

Author:

Müller AleksandraORCID

Abstract

Even though homosexuality and other sexual minorities have never been considered illegal by the Korean government, people identifying as non-heteronormative were and are still vastly ostracised. Furthermore, the LGBT community was and is still facing social stigmatism. What cultural conditions influenced the way non-heteronormative minorities are perceived by most South Korean society? How has the LGBT minority developed over the centuries? When did the attitudes of South Koreans change for the better? The following article covers the answers to the above-stated questions based on a particular query of texts related to the topic based on historiographic records. In the first section, the influence of the Confucian ideas of Three Fundamental Bonds and Five Constant Virtues (三綱五倫, 삼강오륜 [samgangoryun]) on the image of 'correct relationship' and the Taoist division of gender roles based on energy adversity (yin (陰, 음 [eum]) and yang (陽, 양 [yang])) will be explained. This will serve as a basis for understanding cultural opposition to same-sex relationships. The following subchapter consists of a chronological overview of the most important historical records regarding same-sex relationships. The third subchapter presents the sexual minority groups formed in the 1990s, such as Chodong Society (초동회 [chodonghoe]), Between Friends (친구사이 [chingu sai]) and Maeum 001 (마음001 [maeum gongongil]), which had the most significant impact on the development of the contemporary LGBT movement in South Korea. The last section presents current changes and problems that the South Korean LGBT society faces.

Publisher

Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan

Subject

General Medicine

Reference50 articles.

1. Adamczyk, Amy, and Yen-hsin Alice, Cheng. 2015. Explaining Attitudes About Homosexuality in Confucian and Non-Confucian Nations: Is There a Cultural Influence?. Social Science Research, vol. 51: 276–289.

2. Arnold, Matthew David. 2016. Queer Korea: Identity, Tradition, and Activism. Master of Arts Dissertation. Duke University. https://dukespace.lib.duke.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/10161/13472/Queer%20Korea%20Final%20Thesis_Arnoldpdf.pdf?sequence=3

3. Berry, Chris, and Martin, Fran. 2003. Syncretism and Synchronicity: Queer’n’Asian Cyberspace in 1990s Taiwan and Korea. In: Mobile Cultures: New Media in Queer Asia, ed. Chris Berry, 87–114. Durham: Duke University Press.

4. Bicker, Laura. 2019. Gay in South Korea: ‚She said I don’t need a son like you’. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-49751410 (Accessed 25 Jan. 2023).

5. Chen, Pei Jean. 2020. Problematizing love: the intimate event and same-sex love in colonial Korea. In: Queer Korea, ed. Todd A. Henry, 117–145. Durham: Duke University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3