Abstract
Why did the registration of the Gals for Gals name as a trademark and the publication of the Constitutional Tribunal’s ruling stop the largest protest movements for women’s rights in democratic Poland despite unaccomplished goals? What was the source of the 2018 and 2021 demobilization acts and subsequent waves of non-mobilization? Drawing on the theory of moral injury and narrative research methodology, this article aims to account for the determinants of the Gals for Gals’ and the All-Poland Women’s Strike’s demobilization and the lack of mobilization. The main argument is that during the fight for women’s rights, a part of Polish society involved in civic activity experienced two severe traumas. Each of the two waves of mobilization ended in a moral injury development. In both cases, a moral injury involved the loss of trust in self and others. Moreover, in both cases, the moral injuries were so severe that they turned out long-lasting. At the stage of the cognitive dissonance, there were no attempts to resolve it. In other words, activists did nothing to prevent cognitive dissonance from turning into a moral injury. In the first case, it may indicate the organizational and emotional immaturity of activists. In turn, the second case may indicate the weakening of civil society, building Poland’s political culture of withdrawal and submission.
Publisher
Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation
Reference45 articles.
1. Bliska A. (2018), To już koniec ruchu „Dziewuchy Dziewuchom”? Jest oficjalne oświadczenie administratorek, „Noizz”, 21.04.2018, https://noizz.pl/spoleczenstwo/kontrowersje-wokol-ruchu-dziewuchy-dziewuchom/ym4t8rq, 16.07.2022.
2. Boudana S. (2016), Impartiality is Not Fair: Toward an Alternative Approach to the Evaluation of Content Bias in News Stories, “Journalism”, vol. 17, no. 5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884915571295
3. Cavatorta F., Clark J. A. (2022), Political and Social Mobilization in the Middle East and North Africa after the 2011 Uprisings, “Globalizations” [online first view], https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2021.2012910, 14.07.2022.
4. Coffey A., Atkinson P. (1996), Making Sense of Qualitative Data: Complementary Research Strategies, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks–London–New Delhi.
5. Davenport Ch. (2015), How Social Movements Die: Repression and Demobilization of the Republic of New Africa, Cambridge University Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139649728
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献