Abstract
Urban environment management (UEM) and environmental social science (ESS) are two interconnected approaches that show significant potential for creating more sustainable and liveable cities. Their research has, however, been mainly disjointed, which may be because planning and policy have placed more emphasis on UEM than ESS at the same time. This research examined ESS in terms of the quality of life (QOL) criteria and sense of place (SOP) of citizens living by the river with the UEM intervention in the form of policies and programmes. The effects of fieldwork in the form of specialised and spatial interviews are presented in this research, which is usually ignored in the literature review of this type of analysis. The study aims to fill the current gap in this field in three European capitals by providing a reflective methodological account of fieldwork and the ‘elite interviewing’ approach. This paper produces a distinct form of the localisation of the research and sampling techniques and is as new, interactive and developing as possible. The results of the present study are underpinned by the conceptual model of research, which supports the main aim of this analysis and tries to examine the components of research in a new perspective. The findings high- lighted that maintaining and strengthening ESS for citizens living next to rivers require innovative UEM, which uses urban creativity in the field of goals, urban settlements, strategies and management solutions to provide the base for increasing the liveability of the city and improving the quality of urban life.
Publisher
Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference64 articles.
1. Afshari H., Agnihotri S., Searcy C., Jaber M., 2022. Social sustainability indicators: A comprehensive review with application in the energy sector. Sustainable Production and Consumption 31: 263-286. DOI 10.1016/j.spc.2022.02.018. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.02.018.
2. AL-Hashimi M., AL-Sayed, H., 2022. Perception and impact of coronavirus (COVID-19) on people's and lifestyle: E-learning, people, well-being, quality of life, protective measures and government. In: Technologies, artificial intelligence and the future of learning post-COVID-19. Springer: 635-656. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93921-2_33.
3. Alyami M., de Albuquerque J.V., Krägeloh C.U., Alyami H., Henning M.A., 2021. Effects of fear of COVID-19 on mental well-being and quality of life among Saudi adults: A path analysis. Saudi Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences 9(1): 24. DOI https://doi.org/10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_630_20.
4. Băndoi A., Jianu E., Enescu M., Axinte G., Tudor S., Firoiu D., 2020. The relationship between development of tourism, quality of life and sustainable performance in EU countries. Sustainability 12(4): 1628. DOI https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041628.
5. Brotosusilo A., Utari D., Negoro H., Firdaus A., Velentina R., 2022. Community empowerment of waste management in the urban environment: More attention on waste issues through formal and informal educations. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management 8(2): 1-16. DOI https://doi.org/10.22034/GJESM.2022.02.05.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献