How the analytical hierarchical process and revitalisation work together: A case study of Poland

Author:

Rogatka KrzysztofORCID,Starczewski TomaszORCID,Kowalski MateuszORCID

Abstract

Due to the multifaceted nature of the revitalisation process, its evaluation and monitoring, as well as possible comparisons, are complex and difficult to carry out. Evaluation of the revitalisation process currently poses a challenge for all municipalities. The article aims to compare the revitalisation process in the two Polish cities of Toruń and Bydgoszcz. The analysis was based on two financial perspectives: 2007–2015 and 2016–2023. The authors chose a multi-criteria analysis method based on the analytical hierarchical process (AHP) as the main research method. The results show that the Local Revitalisation Programme of the City of Toruń for the years 2007–2015 had the best impact on the revitalisation process. Using the AHP method, we could carry out a multidimensional evaluation of the revitalisation process. Moreover, it allowed us to combine different elements of the evaluation of the revitalisation process and transform them into one synthetic result, ranking each programme in a hierarchy. At the methodological level, the article presents a new approach to conduct research in socio-economic geography, using the tool of multi-criteria analysis derived from the disciplines of economics and management sciences. Until now, the AHP method has not been used in the analysis of the revitalisation process, which confirms the innovative character of the conducted research.

Publisher

Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences

Reference65 articles.

1. Acioly C., 2001. Reviewing urban revitalisation strategies in Rio de Janeiro: From urban project to urban management approaches. Geoforum 32(4): 509-520. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7185(01)00013-6.

2. Adair A., Berry J., McGreal S., Deddis B., Hirst S., 1999. Evaluation of investor behaviour in urban regeneration. Urban Studies 36(12): 2031-2045. DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098992520.

3. Babbie E., 2003. Badania społeczne w praktyce (Social research in practice). Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warsaw.

4. Bednarowska Z., 2015. Desk research - wykorzystanie potencjału danych zastanych w prowadzeniu badań marketingowych i społecznych (Desk research: Exploiting the potential of secondary data in market and social research). Marketing i rynek 2015(7): 18-26.

5. Bury K., 2010. Zastosowanie wielokryterialnej metody QAT w ocenie programów i projektów rewitalizacji (The application of multi-criteria QAT method in the assessment of programs and projects of regeneration). In: Skalski K. (ed.), O budowie metod rewitalizacji w Polsce - aspekty wybrane (About building revitalization methods in Poland - selected aspects). Instytut Spraw Publicznych Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków: 65-89.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3