Abstract
The purpose of the study is to determine the features of neoauthoritarianism as a political regime, its tools, and consequences for global security. It is reasoned that neoauthoritarianism is an undemocratic system of methods and means of exercising centralized state power, which is characterized by the formalisation of democratic principles, institutions and procedures, and the use of digitalization to realize the goals of the regime. The features and tools of neoauthoritarianism are systematized, and the probable consequences of neoauthoritarianism on a global scale are assessed. The following features of neoauthoritarian regimes are determined: reduction of the role of ideology; integration into the global capitalist economy; imitation of a democratic facade; covert forms of pressure and control, manipulation, propaganda; providing a legal basis for any undemocratic initiatives; using the advantages of democratization, globalization, digitalization to achieve the regime’s destructive goals, etc. The following tools of neoauthoritarian influence are determined: power tools, tools of influence within the scope of “soft power,” tools of subversion, tools for changing values, electoral tools, tools of pressure on international organizations, etc. It is proven that due to neoauthoritarian intervention, the risks to global security are increased. The main consequence of ascending neoauthoritarianism on a global scale is the fact that neoauthoritarian regimes have endangered democracy as the dominant global model, reshaping the global security architecture.
Publisher
Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan
Reference40 articles.
1. Adler P. S., Adly A., Armanios D. E. et al. (2023), Authoritarianism, Populism, and the Global Retreat of Democracy: A Curated Discussion, “Journal of Management Inquiry”, Vol. 32, No. 1: 3–20.
2. Allison R. (2017), Russia and the Post-2014 International Legal Order: Revisionism and Realpolitik, “International Affairs”, Vol. 93, No. 1: 519–543.
3. Anthony M., Iii V. A., Gauchan N. (2019), Dystopia is Now: Digital Authoritarianism and Human Rights in Asia, “Global Campus Human Rights Journal”, Vol. 3, No. 2: 269–286.
4. Applebaum A., Pomerantsev P., Smith M., Colliver C. (2017), “Make Germany Great Again” – Kremlin, Alt-Right and International Influences in the 2017 German Elections, London School of Economics Arena Program, and the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, London.
5. Awad H. (2022), Egypt’s New Authoritarianism from an Institutionalist Perspective: Formal-Informal Interactions Before and After the Egyptian Revolution, “British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies”, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/13530194.2022.2113503?needAccess=true&role=button (05.01.2023).