Ethical Considerations in Research about Organizations: Compendium of Strategies

Author:

McGregor Sue L. T.ORCID

Abstract

This paper concerns ethical considerations when conducting research about the policies, procedures, practices, and culture of organizations and institutions rather than research with the humans owning, operating, employed at, volunteering for, benefiting from, or impacted by the organization. Ethical conventions for research with humans are well developed but less so for research about organizations. A pressing concern in the nascent literature is weighing protecting the public interest versus the organization’s interests when sensitive, controversial, or damning information about the latter emerges from the research. Given the absence of formally codified procedural ethics, organizational researchers are encouraged to constantly reexamine, debate, and address related ethical concerns. In that spirit, an inaugural compendium of ethical concerns and recommended strategies gleaned from the literature reviewed is shared, and a discussion of omissions from said literature is tendered to scaffold future conversations around this ethical aspect of organizational research.

Publisher

Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan

Subject

Psychology (miscellaneous),Philosophy,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education

Reference44 articles.

1. Baker L., Phelan S., Snelgrove R., Varpio L., Maggi J., & Ng S. 2016. “Recognizing and Responding to Ethically Important Moments in Qualitative Research,” Journal of Graduate Medical Education 8(4):607-608.

2. Bell E. & Bryman A. 2007. “The Ethics of Management Research: An Exploratory Content Analysis,” British Journal of Management 18(1):63-77.

3. Bell E. & Wray-Bliss Ed. 2009. “Research Ethics: Regulations and Responsibilities,” in D. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods (pp. 78-92). Sage.

4. Benčin R., Šumič-Riha J., Strle G., & Riha R. 2015 (June). Ethics Assessment and Guidance in Different Types of Organisations. Satori. Available online at: https://satoriproject.eu/media/3.e-Universities.pdf (accessed October 10, 2023).

5. Berger R. 2015. “Now I See It, Now I Don’t: Researcher’s Position and Reflexivity in Qualitative Research,” Qualitative Research 15(2):219-235.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3