Abstract
The growing crisis of representative democracy and associated citizen dissatisfaction has stimulated innovative thinking about democracy. Over the past two decades, a wide range of democratic innovations have emerged to increase the involvement of ordinary people in politics, combining direct mass participation with in-depth dialogue on pressing public policy issues. The innovations are rapidly spreading territorially, becoming increasingly institutionalised and tailored to specific political, cultural and social contexts. Mini-publics, which are forums for small-scale debate, are particularly remarkable. Faced with citizens’ dissatisfaction with the practice of the public sphere, there are attempts to institutionalise one-off deliberative forums and make them part of a broader political system. This challenge was first taken up by the German-speaking community of Belgium (Ostelbelgien) and followed by other public authorities. Attempts to incorporate mini-publics into the decision-making space have also been made by local authorities – Paris, Newham and Aachen. In this article I argue that citizens’ assemblies are the most advanced method of institutionalising deliberative democracy. I demonstrate that although the first citizen assemblies realised in the world were one-offs, following their example, particularly because of the success of the unique Ostelbelgien model, subsequent public authorities have begun to see this innovation as an opportunity to permanently (rather than just one-off) power democracy and make it more resilient to crises. I also show that local authorities can play a leading role in strengthening and institutionalising deliberative processes using mini-publics.
Publisher
Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation
Reference71 articles.
1. Almond G. A., Verba S. (1965), The civic culture: political attitudes and democracy in five nations, MA: Little, Brown and Company, Boston.
2. Bedock C., Pilet J. (2021), Who Supports Citizens Selected by Lot to be the Main Policymakers? A Study of French Citizens, “Government and Opposition”, 56(3), pp. 485–504.
3. Blais A., Gidengil E., Nevitte N., et al. (2004), Where Does Turnout Decline Come from?, “European Journal of Political Research”, 43(2), pp. 221–236.
4. Campbell A., Gurin G., Miller W. E. (1954), The voter decides, Evanston, Row, Peterson.
5. Chambers S. (2009), Rhetoric and the public sphere: Has deliberative democracy abandoned mass democracy?, “Political Theory”, 37, 3, pp. 323–350.