Abstract
In the article, I argue that Michel Saward’s popular approach to political representation leads to its particularly problematic understanding as a potentially coercive form of political relationship. Drawing primarily on the experiences of feminist theorists, I argue that beyond analyzing the mechanism of ‘claim-making’, it is also ethically necessary to consider the possibilities and consequences of ‘claim-breaking’. Situations where political representation is broken illustrate how even institutionalized forms of representation often stem from the emotional needs of specific individuals, which politicians cynically exploit. To illustrate this, I utilize and critically assess Saward’s general explanatory model, analyzing the example of Donald Tusk’s resignation from the position of Prime Minister of Poland to assume the role of President of the European Council.
Publisher
Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan
Reference41 articles.
1. Celis K., Childs S., Kantola J. et al. (2014), Constituting Women’s Interests through Representative Claims, “Politics & Gender”, vol. 10, no. 2.
2. Celis K., Childs S. (2020), Feminist democratic representation, Oxford University Press, New York.
3. Cohen A. (2023), The inter-est between us: Ontology, epistemology, and the failure of political representation, “Contemporary Political Theory”, vol. 22, no. 1.
4. Crane P. T. (2006), ‘True Threats’ and the Issue of Intent, “Virginia Law Review”, vol. 92, no. 6.
5. Critchley S. (1999), The ethics of deconstruction: Derrida and Levinas, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.