Efficacy and safety of melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: results from the randomized, open-label, phase III LIGHTHOUSE study
-
Published:2023-08-31
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1592-8721
-
Container-title:Haematologica
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:haematol
Author:
Pour Luděk,Szarejko Monika,Bila Jelena,Schjesvold Fredrik H.,Spicka Ivan,Maisnar Vladimir,Jurczyszyn Artur,Grudeva-Popova Zhanet,Hájek Roman,Usenko Ganna,Thuresson Marcus,Norin Stefan,Jarefors Sara,Bakker Nicolaas A.,Richardson Paul G.,Mateos Maria-Victoria
Abstract
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with ≥3 prior lines of therapy and without prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or with a time to progression >36 months after prior ASCT. The randomized LIGHTHOUSE study (NCT04649060) assessed melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (melflufen group) versus daratumumab in patients with RRMM with disease refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor or who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. A partial clinical hold issued by the US Food and Drug Administration for all melflufen studies led to financial constraints and premature study closure on February 23, 2022 (data cutoff date). In total, 54 of 240 planned patients were randomized (melflufen group, n=27; daratumumab group, n=27). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the melflufen group versus 4.9 months in the daratumumab group (hazard ratio, 0.18 [95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.65]; P=0.0032) at a median follow-up time of 7.1 and 6.6 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 59% in the melflufen group versus 30% in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). The most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen group versus daratumumab group were neutropenia (50% versus 12%), thrombocytopenia (50% versus 8%), and anemia (32% versus 19%). Melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone demonstrated superior PFS and ORR versus daratumumab in RRMM and a safety profile comparable to previously published melflufen studies.
Publisher
Ferrata Storti Foundation (Haematologica)
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献