A survey among Flemish gastroenterologists about endoscopic sedation practices in colorectal cancer screening

Author:

Arnaert S,Vandebroek V,Persyn D,Cool M,Lambrecht G,Desmet G,Deboever G

Abstract

Background & study aims: The sedation levels and methods used for colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening programs vary from country to country and from continent to continent. Little is known in the literature about how frequently the different sedation levels are used in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies. We made a survey among all Flemish gastroenterologists (GI) to determine how frequently they use the different sedation modalities in this target population and to determine the motives of the GI to opt for one or another sedation modality. Patient and methods: An online survey was sent to all 329 Flemish GI by e-mail. A reminder e-mail was sent one month later. Participants could indicate how frequently (by percentage) they used the different sedation methods (no sedation, minimal sedation, conscious sedation, deep sedation) and which sedative medication they administered. In addition, they were asked to indicate their main motives for choosing a specific sedation method. Descriptive statistics were used. Results: 112 out of 329 GI answered the questionnaire (response rate 34%). Anesthesia monitored care is the most frequently used sedation modality, followed by conscious sedation. Patient preference is the main motive for most GI to use each sedation modality. Conclusions: Anesthesia monitored care is currently the most frequently used sedation regimen to perform a colonoscopy in the FIT positive population or in the colorectal cancer screening program in Flanders. The motives given by the GI for choosing one or another sedation modality are not always congruent with current scientific evidence or guidelines. Keywords: colonoscopy, sedation practices, colorectal cancer screening, water exchange, anesthesia monitored care.

Publisher

Universa BV

Subject

General Medicine

Reference29 articles.

1. ZHAO, S., DENG, X. L., WANG, L. et al. The impact of sedation on quality metrics of colonoscopy: a single-center experience of 48,838 procedures. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 35, 1155-1161 (2020).

2. American Society of Anesthesiologists. Distinguishing Monitored Anesthesia Care (“MAC”) from Moderate Sedation/Analgesia (Conscious Sedation). (Approved by the ASA House of Delegates on October 27, 2004). http://www.asahq.org/For-Healthcare-Professionals/Standards-Guidelines-and-Statements.aspx Accessed April 22, 2008

3. FANTI, L., GEMMA, M., ROSSI, G. et al. Sedation and Monitoring for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Worldwide Attitudes and Evidence. Austin J. Gastroenterol. 2, 1030 (2015).

4. PROTOPAPAS, A. A., STOURNARAS, E., NEOKOSMIDIS, G. et al. Endoscopic sedation practices of Greek gastroenterologists: A nationwide survey. Ann. Gastroenterol. 33, 366-373 (2020).

5. FANTI, L., AGOSTONI, M., GEMMA, M. et al. Sedation and monitoring for gastrointestinal endoscopy: A nationwide web survey in Italy. Dig. liver Dis. 43, 726-730 (2011).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3