Affiliation:
1. ULUSLARARASI KIBRIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Abstract
This article aims ta reveal the competition issues in maritime transport and the harmonization of the arrangements between the EU and Turkey. The harmonization process is examined by comparing the relevant provisions in competition law, namely Article 101 and 102 in Treaty on the Functioning ofthe European Union (TFEU) and in Article 4 and 6 in the Law on the Protection of Competition Na. 4054. The impacts of cartel infringement and abuse of a dominant position in the !iner maritime transport is evaluated.
Publisher
Maritime Faculty Journal - Denizcilik Fakultesi Dergisi
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference31 articles.
1. Aktaş, E. B. (2011). Avrupa Birliği ve Türk Rekabet Hukukunda Hakim Durumun Kötüye Kullanılması Masters Thesis, Kadir Has University-The Institute of Social Sciences, İstanbul.
2. Amato, G. (1997). Antitrust and the Bounds of Power. Hart Publishing.
3. Anderson, S. P. and Renault, R. (2008). Price Discrimination. University of Virginia Department of Economics, 2008. http://economics.virginia.edu/sites/economics.virginia.edu/files/anderson/pricedisc080808_0.pdf. Date accessed: September 13, 2021.
4. Aydın, U. (2012). Between Domestic Factors and the EU: Explaining the Emergence of the Turkish Competition Regime. The Antitrust Bulletin, Vol.57, Issue 2, doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603X1205700204.
5. Baatz, Y. (2014). Maritime Law. 3rd Edition. Routledge. Bartalevich, D. (2017). EU Competition Policy and U.S. Antitrust: A Comparative Analysis. European Journal of Law and Economics, Vol.44, Issue 1, doi:10.1007/s10657-014-9459-7.