Abstract
Introduction. Prevention and control of African swine fever (ASF) transmission on the territory of the Russian Federation requires monitoring based on testing of samples from pigs and wild boars. Specific anti-ASFV antibodies are rarely detected in samples during routine serological diagnostics. Although, ASF isolates with weakened virulence were confirmed in Russia and neighboring countries.
The aim of this work was to determine the possibility of using alternative samples for ASF diagnosis and evaluate the effectiveness of the diagnostic methods used on the territory of Russia.
Materials and methods. Biological materials obtained from experimentally infected animals and samples collected in the field conditions were used in this study.
Results. Complex testing (RT-PCR and ELISA) is a more effective approach to diagnose chronic and asymptomatic forms of ASF compared to the separate use of these techniques. The possibility and efficiency of using alternative samples in diagnostics are demonstrated. It was confirmed that IPT method overcomes ELISA by high diagnostic sensitivity and detection of antibodies on earlier stages in extended range of samples. Anti-ASFV antibodies were detected in domestic and wild pigs in five regions of Russia. Samples from infected pigs that are negative in RT-PCR can be positive for anti-ASFV antibodies. The detection of antibodies in samples from shot wild boars (negative or uncertain in RT-PCR test) suggests the existence of animals surviving ASF infection.
Conclusion. The data obtained suggest a revision of the ASF surveillance strategy, by introducing complex diagnostic methods aimed at detection of both the virus genome and anti-ASFV antibodies simultaneously.
Publisher
Central Research Institute for Epidemiology
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Virology,General Medicine
Reference38 articles.
1. Gruzdev K.N., Igolkin A.S., Rakhmanov A.M., Shevtsov A.A. African swine fever in Russia: spread, clinical and anatomical manifestations. Veterinariya segodnya. 2014; (4): 10–24. (in Russian)
2. Beltran-Alcrudo D., Arias M., Gallardo C., Kramer S., Penrith M.L. FAO Animal Production and Health Manual No. 19. African swine fever: Detection and diagnosis. Rome; 2017.
3. Rodionova O.M., Babakov V.A., Kolodub G.V. About the legal nature of compensation for animal slaughter in the epizootic center. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo. 2020; (35): 196–215. https://doi.org/10.17223/22253513/35/17 (in Russian)
4. Penrith M.L., Guberti V., Depner K., Lubroth J. Preparation of African swine fever contingency plans. FAO Animal Production and Health Manual No. 8. Rome; 2009.
5. Alonso C., Borca M., Dixon L., Revilla Y., Rodriguez F., Escribano J.M. ICTV Report Consortium. ICTV Virus Taxonomy Profile: Asfarviridae. J. Gen. Virol. 2018; 99(5): 613–4. https://doi.org/10.1099/jgv.0.001049
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献