Affiliation:
1. Federal Scientific Clinical Center for Medical Radiology and Oncology of the Federal Medical Biological Agency;
Ulyanovsk State University
2. Federal Scientific Clinical Center for Medical Radiology and Oncology of the Federal Medical Biological Agency
Abstract
AIM: to assess the effectiveness of proton radiotherapy as part of a combined approach to the treatment of rectal malignancies and to assess acute radiation toxicity, which directly affects patients’ quality of life.PATIENTS AND METHODS: between 2020 and 2023, a study included 74 patients with rectal cancer. The mean age of the patients was 65 ± 9.9 years, 44 (60%) males. Stage I occurred in 8 (10.8%) patients, stage II — in 14 (18.9%) patients, stage III — in 52 (70.3%) patients. At the first stage, all patients completed proton radiation therapy in the classical fractionation mode.RESULTS: of the adverse events, 49 (66%) patients had grade 1–2 radiation reactions in the form of proctitis and cystitis. There were no local radiation reactions of grade 3 or higher. Systemic complications of grade 3 were noted in 2 (2%) patients in the form of hematological toxicity — anemia (1%), afebrile neutropenia (2%). Of the 62 operated patients, 12 (19.3%) people showed complete therapeutic pathomorphosis. With a median follow-up of 23 months (13;35), 1 (1.35%) patient showed continued tumor growth 28 months after completed radiotherapy, 2 (2.7%) patients had local recurrence 3 and 18 months after treatment. Distant metastases to the lungs, liver, or bones were detected in 9 (12.2%) patients, median — 12 months (6;23). Mortality during the entire observation period was 9 (12.2%) patients. Sixty-two (83.8%) patients showed no signs of relapse or progression of the disease, of which 9 (14.5%) patients did not receive any treatment after chemoradiotherapy and are in the process of active follow-up.CONCLUSION: proton radiation therapy in patients with rectal cancer in two-year overall survival (90.5%) and progression-free survival (88.9%) are comparable with the literature data of recent studies, but are superior in overall survival pathological response (19.3%).
Publisher
Russian Association of Coloproctology
Reference22 articles.
1. Jin J, Tang Y, Hu C, et al. Multicenter, Randomized, Phase III Trial of Short-Term Radiotherapy Plus Chemotherapy Versus Long-Term Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (STELLAR). J Clin Oncol. 2022 May 20;40(15):1681–1692. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01667 Epub 2022 Mar 9. PMID: 35263150; PMCID: PMC9113208.
2. Schrag D, et al. PROSPECT: A randomized phase III trial of neoadjuvant chemoradiation versus neoadjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy with selective use of chemoradiation, followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) for treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) (Alliance N1048). JCO 41, LBA2-LBA2 (2023). doi: 10.1200/JCO.2023.41.17_suppl.LBA2
3. Dobrodeev A.Yu., Tarasova A.S., Afanasyev S.G., et al. The results of combined treatment with preoperative chemotherapy of patients with cancer of the upper ampullary rectum. Koloproktologia. 2023;22(4):45–52. doi: 10.33878/2073-7556-2023-22-4-45-52 (in Russ.).
4. Giunta EF, Bregni G, Pretta A, et al. Total neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: Making sense of the results from the RAPIDO and PRODIGE 23 trials. Cancer Treat Rev. 2021 May;96:102177. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102177 Epub 2021 Mar 16. PMID: 33798955.
5. Cercek A, et al. Phase II, single-arm, open-label study of dostarlimab monotherapy in previously untreated patients with stage II/III dMMR/MSI-H locally advanced rectal cancer. JCO. 2023;41:TPS3639-TPS3639. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.TPS3639