“Cold” polypectomy for colorectal polyps: prospective randomized trial

Author:

Toporkova O. S.1ORCID,Veselov V. V.2ORCID,Vaganov Yu. E.1ORCID,Nagudov M. A.1ORCID,Majnovskaya O. A.1ORCID,Chernyshov S. V.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology

2. Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia

Abstract

Background: endoscopic electroexcision is the standard technique for the removal of colorectal polyps. However, it is associated with the postoperative morbidity. In order to reduce the incidence of complications, “cold” excision seems to be an alternative option.Aim: to improve the results of endoscopic treatment for patients with colorectal polyps.Patients and methods: from September 2019 to September 2020, 160 patients ≥ 18 years old (80 in each group), who underwent endoscopic removal of colorectal polyps ≤ 10 mm in size by cold excision (132 lesions) and traditional polypectomy (129 lesions), were included in a prospective randomized trial. All removed specimens were studied histologically with an assessment of the resection margins (R0/R1). The analysis of the postoperative complications after endoscopic polypectomy and the incidence of Rx resection after removal of polyps by both techniques was done.Results: the compared groups were homogenous in the number of patients, gender, age, and comobridities. There were no significant differences in the number of removed polyps, their site and the type according to endoscopic classifications. The operation time was significantly higher in the conventional polypectomy group compared with the “cold” one (p = 0.0001). There were no significant differences in the intraoperative complications rate between the two groups (p = 0.06). There were no postoperative complications in the “cold” group. In the control group postoperative complications occurred after 12 out of 129 polyps removal (p = 0.001). The univariate analysis showed that a risk factor for the development of postoperative complications after conventional polypectomy is the lack of submucosal lifting (OR: 15.3, 95% CI: 1.9-125.6, p = 0.01). Histopathology of the removed specimens showed that in both groups most of the procedures were considered as R0 resections (54% in the main group, 56.4% in the control group, p = 0.8). The polyp size ≤ 4 mm identified as a risk factor for R1, Rx resection (OR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.3–4.7, p = 0.007).Conclusion: “cold” polypectomy is an effective and safe method and may be recommended as an alternative technique for the removal of non-pedunculated colorectal polyps ≤ 10 mm.

Publisher

Russian Association of Coloproctology

Subject

Materials Chemistry

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3