Affiliation:
1. Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology;
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
2. Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology
Abstract
Aim: to compare the efficacy and safety of hybrid laparo-endoscopic operations and laparoscopic segmental colectomy for benign endoscopically non-removable colorectal tumors.Materials and Methods: systematic review and meta-analysis included 17 studies which evaluate the results of hybrid laparo-endoscopic procedure (main group) and laparoscopic segmental colectomy (control group). The study included 835 patients — 517 in main group and 318 controls.Results: operation time was significantly lower in main than in control group (mean difference = −38,7 minutes; 95% CI: −51,4 — −26, p < 0,00001). There was significant difference in postoperative hospital stay. It was shorter in main group (mean difference = −2,3 days; 95% CI: −3,17 — −1,57, p < 0,00001). There was not significant difference between odds ratio of postoperative morbidity (OR = 0,7; 95% CI: 0,38–1,53, p = 0,44), mortality (OR = 0,4; 95% CI: 0,07–3,11, p = 0,43) and local recurrence rate as well (OR = 2,8; 95% CI: 0,68–11,35, p = 0,15).Conclusion: the hybrid laparo-endoscopic technique patients with benign endoscopically non-removable colon tumors does not increase the postoperative morbidity and mortality. At the same time, the hybrid technology reduces the operation time and postoperative hospital stay.
Publisher
Russian Association of Coloproctology
Subject
Gastroenterology,Oncology,Surgery