Cutaneous blood flow during exercise is higher in endurance-trained humans

Author:

Fritzsche Ricardo G.1,Coyle Edward F.1

Affiliation:

1. Human Performance Laboratory, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712

Abstract

This study determined whether cutaneous blood flow during exercise is different in endurance-trained (Tr) compared with untrained (Untr) subjects. Ten Tr and ten Untr men (62.4 ± 1.7 and 44.2 ± 1.8 ml ⋅ kg 1 ⋅ min 1, respectively; P < 0.05) underwent three 20-min cycling-exercise bouts at 50, 70, and 90% peak oxygen uptake in this order, with 30 min rest in between. The environmental conditions were neutral (∼23–24°C, 50% relative humidity, front and back fans at 2.5 m/s). Because of technical difficulties, only seven Tr and seven Untr subjects completed all forearm blood flow and laser-Doppler cutaneous blood flow (CBF) measurements. Albeit similar at rest, at the end of all three exercise bouts, forearm blood flow was ∼40% higher in Tr compared with Untr subjects (50%: 4.64 ± 0.50 vs. 3.17 ± 0.20, 70%: 6.17 ± 0.61 vs. 4.41 ± 0.37, 90%: 6.77 ± 0.62 vs. 5.01 ± 0.37 ml ⋅ 100 ml 1 ⋅ min 1, respectively; n = 7; all P < 0.05). CBF was also higher in Tr compared with Untr subjects at all relative intensities ( n = 7; all P < 0.05). However, esophageal temperature was not different in Tr compared with Untr subjects at the end of any of the aforementioned exercise bouts (50%: 37.8 ± 0.1 vs. 37.9 ± 0.1°C, 70%: 38.1 ± 0.1 vs. 38.1 ± 0.1°C, and 90%: 38.8 ± 0.1 vs. 38.6 ± 0.1°C, respectively). We conclude that a higher CBF may allow Tr subjects to achieve an esophageal temperature similar to that of Untr, despite their higher metabolic rates and thus higher heat production rates, during exercise at 50–90% peak oxygen uptake.

Publisher

American Physiological Society

Subject

Physiology (medical),Physiology

Cited by 76 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3