Dynamics of fixational eye position and microsaccades during spatial cueing: the case of express microsaccades

Abstract

Microsaccades are systematically modulated by peripheral spatial cues, and these eye movements have been implicated in perceptual and motor performance changes in cueing tasks. However, an additional oculomotor factor that may also influence performance in these tasks, fixational eye position itself, has been largely neglected so far. Using precise eye tracking and real-time retinal-image stabilization, we carefully analyzed fixational eye position dynamics and related them to microsaccade generation during spatial cueing. As expected, during baseline fixation, microsaccades corrected for a foveal motor error away from the preferred retinal locus of fixation (the so-called ocular position “set point” of the oculomotor system). However, we found that this relationship was violated during a short period immediately after cue onset; a subset of cue-directed “express microsaccades” that were highly precise in time and direction, and that were larger than regular microsaccades, occurred. These movements, having <100-ms latencies from cue onset, were triggered when fixational eye position was already at the oculomotor set point when the cue appeared; they were thus error-increasing rather than error-decreasing. Critically, even when no microsaccades occurred, fixational eye position itself was systematically deviated toward the cue, again with ~100-ms latency, suggesting that the oculomotor system establishes a new set point at different postcue times. This new set point later switched to being away from the cue after ~200–300 ms. Because eye position alters the location of retinal images, our results suggest that both eye position and microsaccades can be associated with performance changes in spatial cueing tasks. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Covert spatial cueing tasks are a workhorse for studying cognitive processing in humans and monkeys, but gaze is not perfectly stable during these tasks. We found that minute fixational eye position changes, independent of the more studied microsaccades, are not random in cueing tasks and are thus not “averaged out” in analyses. These changes can additionally dictate microsaccade times. Thus, in addition to microsaccadic influences, retinal image changes associated with fixational eye position are relevant for performance in cueing tasks.