Dynamics and directional sensitivity of neck muscle spindle responses to head rotation

Abstract

With the use of floating electrodes we recorded from the C2 dorsal root ganglion of decerebrate cats during sinusoidal and trapezoidal head rotation. Fifty-one spontaneously firing afferents were identified as muscle spindle endings. Some were identified by their excitatory response to injection of succinylcholine, others by the similarity of their behavior to that of endings excited by the drug. Because afferent input to the ganglion was restricted by sectioning most nerve trunks, most spindle endings were presumably located in ventral and ventrolateral perivertebral muscles. The firing of each spindle afferent was modulated most effectively by tilting the head in a specific direction; this direction was termed its response vector. Responses to sine waves and trapezoids were then studied with stimuli oriented as closely as possible to the vertical plane of this vector. Most spindle afferents could be classified in one of two categories. Those with high gain, pronounced nonlinearity, and high dynamic index were called type A. Those classified as type B had low gain, a fairly linear response, and low dynamic index. In response to small (0.5 degrees) stimuli, type A endings had phase leads of approximately 40 degrees at frequencies of sinusoidal stimulation of 0.02-0.1 Hz, increasing to approximately 80 degrees at 4 Hz; with larger (2.5 degrees) stimuli, phase was advanced by an additional 10-20 degrees at all frequencies. Phase of type B responses was less advanced than that of type A responses. Gain slopes of the two types of endings were similar. Bode plots of spindle afferents strongly resembled those of upper cervical neurons whose activity is modulated by head rotation. Each spindle afferent had a response vector whose direction remained stable with time, different frequencies of stimulation, and different stimulus amplitudes. The distribution of response vectors covered approximately 270 degrees, with a gap near nose down pitch. Changing initial head position usually had little effect on the direction of an afferent's response vector or on response dynamics. However, stimulation far from the best plane could transform a type A into a type B response. This raises the possibility that type B receptors could be type A receptors best stimulated by yaw and with only low sensitivity to stimulation in vertical planes. Type A receptors have all the properties of spindle primaries. The identification of type B receptors remains uncertain, because they may include secondary afferents as well as primaries stimulated far from their best three-dimensional vector.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)