Affiliation:
1. Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Oklahoma HealthSciences Center, Oklahoma City 73190.
Abstract
1. Lumbosacral spinothalamic tract (STT) neurons can be inhibited by noxious pinch of the contralateral hindlimb or either forelimb and by electrical stimulation of cardiopulmonary sympathetic, splanchnic, and hypogastric afferents. A previous study found that spinal transections between C2 and C4 sometimes abolished the inhibitory effect of spinal afferent input and sometimes left it intact. This suggested that propriospinal neurons in the C1 and C2 segments might mediate this effect. To test whether neurons in the C1 and C2 segments were involved in producing this inhibitory effect, the magnitude of the reduction in neural activity was measured in the same STT neuron before and after spinal transection at C1 or between C3 and C7. 2. All neurons were antidromically activated from the contralateral thalamus and thoracic spinal cord. For us to accept a neuron for analysis, the characteristics of the somatic input and the latency and shape of the antidromatic spike produced by spinal cord stimulation had to be the same before and after the spinal transection. Also, spinal transection often causes a marked increase in spontaneous cell activity, which may affect the magnitude of an inhibitory response. To avoid this confounding problem, a cell was accepted for analysis only if it showed marked inhibition of high cell activity evoked by somatic pinch before spinal transection. For analysis 13 STT neurons met these criteria: 6 neurons were in monkeys with C1 transections, and 7 neurons were in animals with transections between C3 and C7.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Publisher
American Physiological Society
Subject
Physiology,General Neuroscience
Cited by
44 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献